Wednesday, 12 August 2015

define torts, essential element of torts and pigeon theory of torts



A tort is a civil breach committed against another in which the injured party can sue for damages. In personal injury cases, the injured party will attempt to receive compensation with the representation of a personal injury lawyer in order to recover from damages incurred. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are four elements to tort law: duty, breach of duty, causation, and injury. In order to claim damages, there must be a breach in the duty of the defendant towards the plaintiff, which results in an injury. The three main types of torts are negligence, strict liability (product liability), and intentional torts.
Intentional Interference with a Person
All tortious charges of intentional interference with person/property involve intent, which provides for a civil wrong, knowingly committed by the offender.  This contrasts with torts of negligence, which results from lack of concern or responsibility on behalf of the offender.These damages are dealt with through civil litigation.
Defenses to Intentional Interference with Persons
When a plaintiff accuses a defendant of an intentional tort, it is the defendant's responsibility to identify any justifications for his actions that may excuse him from liability. In tort law, there are several privileges that a defendant may apprehend, in order to avoid liability. It is up to the courts to determine whether the defendant's privilege excuses him from liability. They need to conclude on whether the defendant had consent, permission by the plaintiff, or whether the plaintiff was defending himself, his property, or another person. If the defendant is able to establish privilege, then it is said that he has not committed a tortious act and will not be held liable.
Negligence: Standard of Conduct
There are certain elements that are required to prove that a defendant acted negligently. There is a specific code of conduct which all people are expected to follow and there is a duty of the public to act in a certain way, which reduces the risk of harm to others. Negligence can only be claimed by an injured plaintiff, whose interests have actually been interfered with. This portrays that a plaintiff must prove his injuries, and prove that they were caused by the defendant. This proximate cause is the link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injuries. There is a statute of limitations in negligence cases, however, there are several rules, such as discovery and continuing negligence, which may excuse a plaintiff from the statute of limitations.
Negligence Proof
The necessity for a negligence case to be tried in a court of law is essential and evident. Tort law, like any other law, is tough to decide upon when an enforcement or violation issue arises, and is furthermore tedious. In negligence cases, a court appoints a jury to make a decision upon a case based on the direct or circumstantial evidence that is available to them. The burden of proof a plaintiff faces in a case, relates to four elements of proof that must exist in order for them to be able to prove that a negligent act not only existed, but the fact that the act by a defendant, led to the injury sustained by the plaintiff. 
Proximate Cause
The name given to the direct cause of an accident, or incident leading to injury, is referred to as 'proximate'. The term proximate has long been known to mean near, or in the vicinity of, not actual. This gives a misconception to the name, as if the cause was nearly opposed to the actual one. Other issues arise deeper within proximate cause, and that is with the scope of liability and its extent. Controversy exists as to where liability should be extended to a defendant, based on their responsibility or duty.
Joint Tortfeasors
Joint tortfeasors, seen as equally liable for the committing of a tort, usually can be combined under one indictment. This is known as a "joinder of defendants". In a case similar to this, one significant reasoning behind its institution besides the commonality that the defendants share in their joint action, is that of "judicial economy." In reference to this term, the court is making the decision that placing all defendants under one sole indictment will be the most appropriate option in terms of efficiency and, ultimately, cost-effectiveness for the judicial system itself. Due to the mounting quantities of cases arising daily, this practice is employed as a worthwhile alternative, especially when an occasion such as that of joint tortfeasors comes about.
Limited Duty
In legal terms, duty is seen as an individuals obligation to act in a manner conducive to the well being of everyone around them, such as the prevention of any "foreseeable injury to a victim." Such a term that best represents this obligation is that of a "duty of care", or even "good Samaritan" to an extent. Duty, itself, serves two other important functions for societal concerns attached to tort law. These include a "general principle" and a "limitation." A general principle provides a precedence for future cases, while limitation sets forth the "boundaries" for which liability may exist for individuals involved in an incident. Actual application of this term comes in the form of its existence at the "abstract level" and "in fact or problem".
Owners & Occupiers
The concerns for areas outside of the premises of a given property deal with the condition of such a property. This is in direct regards to certain factors and attributes such as structural or fixtures on the property that could have an effect on the immediate areas surrounding it. The term trespassing adults refers to any person who has been found to be entering, occupying, or traveling through a property that is owned by someone else, without their permission or consent. Licensees are persons that are given a license, as a form of permission, to enter a property lawfully. Such persons are to enter the property for a reason that does not have to be in the best interest or benefit of the owner. By being granted the license to enter and occupy such property, this individual is exempt from trespassing status, and is completely abiding by the law.


Negligence- Defenses
Contributory negligence is one of the most commonly used negligence defenses. The defendant attempts to deny the plaintiff the right to action, by claiming that the plaintiff's own negligence played a large role in his injuries. In contributory negligence, both parties are guilty of negligence, but the plaintiff is not awarded any damages. The last clear chance rule is an exception to the contributory negligence defense which permits the plaintiff more freedom in taking action against a defendant when the plaintiff is also guilty of negligence. The last clear chance refers to an instance where the defendant had the last clear chance to avoid injuring the plaintiff, but did not take the opportunity. In cases where both the plaintiff and the defendant are both guilty of some degree of negligence, contributory negligence places liability solely on the plaintiff.
Imputed Negligence
Vicarious liability represents a venue in which individuals may be "vicariously" held accountable for the actions of individuals other than themselves. In these cases, the ones held liable are those who have some type of legal claim to the actual individuals at fault. Two such persons may be parents to mischievous children or employers to careless employees, as well as a guardian. In each circumstance, the liable individuals are taking the place of others. A joint enterprise is described as an action, which involves two or more individuals, usually with monetary considerations involved. Additional elements which comprise it include a common goal as well as concurrent rights to take the lead of the operation.
Strict Liability
The basic structure that encompasses that of strict liability is the fact that liability is maintained despite any intent otherwise. In this way, it matters only that the action was performed to its fruition and an eventual injury of another. Certain areas in which safety laws have had to come to the forefront concerning liability include incidents involving product defects. In cases such as these, consumers must only prove that their injuries stemmed directly from the product in question in order to garner an appropriate judgment from the court. The purpose behind such a seemingly rigid form of legislature is to prevent future occurrences from happening by providing precedence to fall in line with.
Compensation Systems
In tort cases, victims often receive compensation, including monetary judgments. However, some judgments include other factors such as: the accused, publicly admitting guilt. In most jurisdictions, the courts have placed limits, or judgment ranges, which depend on specific factors found in the case. In most cases, victims that sustain injuries receive a judgment which maxes out, regardless of how painful and permanent the injury may be. However, the courts can award other judgments, in addition to the one made for specific bodily injury.


Nuisance
In modern tort law there are different types of nuisances: public, private, and absolute. A private nuisance effects one individuals enjoyment of his land, while a public nuisance effects a larger amount of citizens, or the public in general. Absolute nuisances are nuisances for which the defendant is strictly liable. The simple form of nuisance is described as an act which takes away from rights to the use, and enjoyment of land that every owner has.
Products Liability
Products Liability is a field of tort law which concerns the responsibility of the manufacturer or vendor of a product to ensure that products are safe and do not cause injury. Products subjected to liability include all consumer goods, medical devices, commercial/personal vehicles, aircraft and consumable goods such as food and prescription drugs. As it is the duty of a product vendor or manufacturer to produce/supply a product which will not cause harm during normal use, manufacturer/vendors of unsafe products are subject to recovery for damages.
Misrepresentation & Nondisclosure
Misrepresentation and nondisclosure form two fundamental bases for many actions represented under tort law. Any case where false or hidden information plays a significant part, essentially implies a standard of care that reflects the negligence addressed by tort.  
To phrase it more simply, the fact that information has been withheld or misrepresented directly implies a negligent situation. This means that among the various subsections of tort law, cases of misrepresentation and nondisclosure can prove to be the easiest to form a legal consensus of opinion on whether negligence has happened, due to the very idea that the act itself is a negligent action. 
Misrepresentation and nondisclosure can take many forms, but generally they refer to an act or service. they are usually rendered for compensation that do not fulfill their terms of promise, either because they misrepresent their ability to perform, or fail to disclose elements that prevent adequate performance (like a unknown side effect for a product, or a conflict of interest in a case of service).  
There are many remedies one may seek when a case of misrepresentation can be seen to have occurred, though the extent to which they fall under tort law or other forms of legal action are highly dependent on the specific legal system, as well as the nature of the misrepresentation.  In nearly all cases, there is an obligation on the provider of a product or service to provide information either by law, or by request, so as to adhere to all legal standards of accurate representation.
Defamation
The term defamation refers to an abusive attack on a person's character or to make false claims against someone in order to damage their good name. There are two forms of defamation that can be used: libel and slander. An unreasonable person may abuse the right of privilege in order to commit defamation against another person. The right of privilege (or "qualified privilege")  being that a person has a right to make statements during the trial process. This privilege often protects against an unreasonable person who wishes to make defamation statements.     
Misuse of Legal Procedure
Misuse of Legal Procedure is a series of torts that involve the corrupt or undue filing of litigation for unlawful reasons. Public right of access to courts is granted on good faith that claimants will act with probable cause and honesty. Conversely, when a plaintiff in a lawsuit is found to have initiated legal action for purposes of deliberate harassment or inconvenience of the defendant, or when the court terminates the suit in favor of the defense, the defense may seek damage compensation for losses incurred in the legal process. These losses may be qualified under charges of Malicious Prosecution, Wrongful Civil Proceedings or Abuse of Process. 
Domestic Relations 
Domestic Relations is an evolving area of Tort Law which deals with a family's inner workings. The evolution of Domestic Relations Tort has not only shaped the way that family's may collect for damages or interference to the family unit itself resulting from tortious conduct; it has shaped the way husbands, wives, children and legal guardians are viewed as legal entities. Originally, under common law, children and wives were treated as chattels and functioned under a man's proprietary rights. In the 1900's, several advances in Family Law provided for the legal rights of women and children to act as distinct legal entities from their husbands/fathers. 
Survival & Wrongful Death
Survival and Wrongful Death are tort claims made after the death of an individual in an at-fault situation. This means that the deceased must be victim of a tort, before death or at the time of death. Survival actions are raised by the executives of the victim's estate, and are continuations of tort actions that the victim would have been entitled to raise in life. Wrongful death claims are made by surviving dependent's for the loss of the decedent's contributions to their lives.
Economic Relations
Torts of Economic Relations are allegations of direct interference with business relationships, agreements, or prospects, which result in quantifiable losses. When suing for Torts of Economic Relations, it is important that the plaintiff be able to prove that the defendant acted intentionally with knowledge of his or her own actions, and that the subsequent actions were injurious to the claimant in the form of economic losses. Torts of Economic Relations normally fall under classifications of Interference with Contractual Relations, Interference with Prospective Advantage or claims of Injurious Falsehood.



Immunities
In tort cases, there are certain intervening factors which allow individuals immunity, from their actions. Immunity implies either, that the person could not understand the risks associated with their actions or that they cannot be held liable because they were acting on behalf of the government or other entity. Cases, in which individuals are not likely to understand the possible outcomes of their actions, include infant immunity or insanity immunity. 
Infant immunity applies to minors that are too young to grasp the consequences of their actions. In addition, the minor must not have no intent to cause harm to person or property. It can not be claimed that the minor did not understand the consequences of their actions, if they intended the negative consequences that resulted from their actions. Intent can not be present without an understanding of possible outcomes. In cases that involve infant immunity, the parents or guardians of the minor, could be held liable for their actions, regardless of the minors understanding of the possible outcomes of those actions.
Insanity immunity can be utilized as a defense in cases where a person is deemed insane, or mentally incapable of understanding the possible outcomes of an action. In cases where insanity immunity is a factor, the caregiver of the person that acted in manner which caused a negative outcome, could be held liable in the same manner that a parent or guardian could be liable for a minor. In either case, the actor and those responsible for the care of the actor, could both be held liable for the action.
Define Torts –
A tort is simply a civil wrong. There are three general types of torts that may cause injury to another person. In civil law, torts are grounds for lawsuits to compensate a grieving party for any damages or injuries suffered.
Tort Law: Three Types of Torts
Torts are wrongdoings that are done by one party against another. As a result of the wrongdoing, the injured person may take civil action against the other party. To simplify this, let's say while walking down the aisle of a grocery store, you slip on a banana that had fallen from a shelf. You become the plaintiff, or injured party, and the grocery store is considered the tortfeasor or defendant, the negligent party.
Simply said, you would probably take civil action against the grocery store to recoup compensation for pain, suffering, medical bills and expenses incurred as a result of the fall. Negligence is just one tort category. There are three general categories of torts. Regardless of the tort action, three elements must be present:
  • Tort feasor, or defendant, had a duty to act or behave in a certain way.
  • Plaintiff must prove that the behavior demonstrated by the tortfeasor did not conform to the duty owed to the plaintiff.
  • The plaintiff suffered an injury or loss as a result.
Because torts are a civil action involving private parties, punishment does not include a fine or incarceration. The punishment for tortious acts usually involves restoring the injured party monetarily. Sometimes a court order may force the tortfeasor to either do or not do something. Think trespassing, defamation or slander. Let's explore the three types of torts:
  • Intentional torts
  • Negligence torts
  • Strict liability torts
Intentional Torts
An intentional tort is an act that is intentionally committed against another person with the aim of causing harm. There are several intentional torts that fall into this category, like assault, battery, conversion, fraud, false imprisonment, trespassing and invasion of privacy. Not every injury-producing action is cause for an intentional tort lawsuit. The court will look at the conduct of the defendant to determine whether the actions were, in fact, intentional or just mere willful and wanton behavior not specifically meant to cause fear or injury, but is considered reckless.
Betty Geeslin, a personal representative of Bill Geeslin in Bill Geeslin v. Kobe Bryant, is one of those cases. Back in November of 2005, Geeslin and a friend attended a Lakers/Grizzlies game. The fans held courtside seats for the event. At some point during the game, famous basketball player Bryant ran to retrieve an out-of-bounds ball. As he reached for the ball, he lost his footing and fell atop Geeslin, leaving him with injury to his chest and lungs. After several days, Geeslin, now home, began experiencing uncomfortable pain in his chest severe enough to visit an emergency room. Once examined, it was diagnosed that he suffered a bruising and a crushed lung. He was prescribed several pain medications and a breathing machine and sent home.
After a few weeks of home treatment, Geeslin decided to sue Bryant for assault, battery and infliction of emotional distress. Geeslin claimed that when Kobe attempted to remove himself from Geeslin's chest, he used extreme force to push away, causing injury. Geeslin also claimed that he could no longer sleep at night, suffered anxiety and felt embarrassed by the incident in general.
When the court analyzed the case, it felt that the elements for tortious behavior were not present. Specifically, Geeslin assumed the risk of injury by choosing courtside seats. Bryant in no way intended to cause injury to Geeslin at the time of the initial fall or as he attempted to return to the court, and a reasonable person would not conclude that the incident was so seriously traumatic that Geeslin suffered emotional distress to the degree he claimed. In a motion for defendant's summary judgment, the court ruled in favor of Bryant.
On a side note, Geeslin died prior to final judgment and a personal representative maintained the claim against Bryant until time of final judgment. However, Bryant settled with the estate out of court for the sum of $75,000 to put a rest to any further appeals or complaints against him. Our next torts deal with actions that cause injury that do not have intentional characteristics.


Negligence Torts –
              Negligence occurs when a party fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent person would take in the same situation and an injury results from the action or inaction. There are five elements necessary to prove a negligence case:
  • Defendant owed a duty of reasonable care.
  • Defendant did not behave in a reasonable manner to demonstrate care.
  • Plaintiff suffered an injury as a result of the defendant's actions or inactions.
  • The injury caused actual damages.
  • Proximate cause, defendant's actions or inactions were the cause of injury.
              While these elements seem repetitive, they are necessary for a negligence case. Let's see what happens in a comical case involving negligence.
              In Byrne v. Boadle (1863), Byrne was walking down the street when a barrel full of flour fell out of a window and landed upon him, causing the plaintiff injury. In this case, the flour shop owed anyone walking on the sidewalk below the window a duty of care. In other words, a flour barrel should not be in a window where it could fall. The defendant should have used reasonable care that the flour barrels are stored in an area of the shop where injury to a passer-by could not possibly happen. Byrne was injured because of the flour shop's negligence in storing flour barrels appropriately, leaving the flour shop solely responsible for this injury. Needless to say, this was a prima facie case because the evidence was strong enough on face value to convince a court to rule in favor of the plaintiff.
Strict Liability Torts
               Cases involving strict liability are similar to negligence. In these instances, the defendant may be responsible for damages even if the defendant was not negligent. This may seem counter-intuitive, but it makes sense. Let's take the dog bite law as an
Q:- What is tort ? What are its characteristics ?
Answer :-
                The definition of Tort is not exhaustive . Many eminent authors have defined ‘Tort ‘  but a real exhaustive definition of a tort has yet to be found . ‘Tort ‘is a French word meaning wrong . The word ‘tort’ has actually been derived from the Latin term ‘tortum ‘ which means ‘to twist ‘or ‘wrongful.’ Salmond defined tort as a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for unliquidated damages , and which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or breach of a trust or other merely equitable obligations . The definition given by Salmond has been adopted in different English cases as well as in section 2 of the Indian Limitation Act which defined tort as a civil wrong which is not exclusively the breach of a trust .
 The five important characteristics of a tort are as follows :-
1) Civil wrong .
A tort is a civil wrong unlike crime , breach of contract or breach of trust .


2) Infringement of a right in rem .
Tort is an infringement of right in rem and not right in personam . A right in rem is a right which is available against the whole world . As for example , one’s right not to be assaulted or defamed is a right in rem .
 3) Right fixed by law .
The right infringed in tort should not be a right based on consent of the parties but it should be a right fixed by law .

4) Common Law action .
The remedy available in tort should be a Common Law action . The Common Law action is also actionable in India .

5) Remedy .
Remedy of a tort should be damages or compensation in money . But the other remedies such as injunction , restitution of land , ejectment of trespasser are also available .


Q : - Discuss the pigeon hole theory .

Answer :- 
             Salmond opined that  there is no law of tort but merely law of torts . This meant to say that the law of torts consists of a number of specific rules prohibiting certain harmful acts . According to this school of thought there is specific well defined wrongs or there is only a law of torts and no general law of tort . It is meant that there is a list of acts and omissions , in certain circumstances which are actionable in a court of law . A person is entitled to file a suit against only that harm which comes within one of these categories . As  there are specific crimes like theft , forgery , dacoity , murder and etc. , this theory says that  likewise there are certain specific torts and all the other wrongs fall outside of this purview .
             The law if torts consists of a set of a neat of pigeon holes , each containing a specific labelled tort . When the defendant’s wrong does not fit in any of these pigeon holes he is said to have committed no tort .This theory is also known as pigeon hole theory . Sir Frederick Pollock strongly supported this theory of pigeon hole.

            In the old English case of Allen Vs. Flood , appreciating this theory of pigeon hole , Court held that every plaintiff must bring his case under one or the other of the well recognized heads of torts

            The theory of pigeon hole has been criticized by the latter writers . According to the critics if this theory is accepted then the new categories of liability in tort would be closed . The Courts would be prevented from recognizing any new torts . There is not a single ground where the Courts refused plaintiff’s case on the ground that the case relates to new tort .
           In the case of Ashby Vs. White , it has been clearly established that mere novelty will not prevent a person from suing in tort . In fact , Torts are infinitely various and not limited or confined          
         In the case of Ushaben Tribedi & Another Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mondir & others , the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court observed that it is true that tort is not defined . Torts are infinitely various and not limited and confined . The novelty of claim may arise and Court may recognize a novel claim . India is a country where various religions are followed , and this has to be kept in mind while evolving a new tort .

Sunday, 9 August 2015

THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT, 1923


16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
INDEX
THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT, 1923

Section Particulars
Introduction
CHAPTER I : PRELIMINARY
1. Short title, extent and commencement
2. Definitions
CHAPTER II : WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION
3. Employer’s liability for compensation
4. Amount of compensation
4A. Compensation to be paid when due and penalty for default
5. Method of calculating wages
6. Review
7. Commutation of half-monthly payments
8. Distribution of compensation
9. Compensation not to be assigned, attached or charged
10. Notice and claim
10A. Power to require from employers statements regarding fatal
accidents
10B. Reports of fatal accidents and serious bodily injuries
11. Medical examination
12. Contracting
13. Remedies of employer against stranger
14. Insolvency of employer
14A. Compensation to be first charge on assets transferred by
employer
15. Special provisions relating to masters and seamen
15A. Special provisions relating to captains and other members of
crew of aircrafts

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

15B. Special provisions relating to workmen abroad of companies
and motor vehicles
16. Returns as to compensation
17. Contracting out
18. Proof of age
18A. Penalties
CHAPTER III: COMMISSIONERS
19. Reference to Commissioners
20. Appointment of Commissioners
21. Venue of proceedings and transfer
22. Form of application
22A. Power of Commissioner to require further deposit in cases of
fatal accident
23. Powers and procedure of Commissioners
24. Appearance of parties
25. Method of recording evidence
26. Costs
27. Power to submit cases
28. Registration of agreements
29. Effect of failure to register agreement
30. Appeals
30A. Withholding of certain payments pending decision of appeal
31. Recovery
CHAPTER IV : RULES
32. Power of the State Government to make rules
33. [Repealed]
34. Publication of rules
35. Rules to give effect to arrangements with other countries for
the transfer of money paid as compensation
36. Rules made by Central Government to be laid before

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
Parliament
SCHEDULE I List of injuries
SCHEDULE II List of persons who, subject to the provisions of
section 2(l)(n), are included in the definition of
workmen
SCHEDULE III List of occupational diseases
SCHEDULE IV Factors for working out lump sum equivalent of
compensation amount in case of permanent
disablement and death


16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT, 1923
INTRODUCTION
The growing complexity of industry in this country, with the increasing use of
machinery and consequent danger to workmen, along with the comparative
poverty of the workmen themselves, rendered it advisable that they should be
protected, as far as possible from hardship arising from accidents. After a
detailed examination of the question by the Government of India, Local
Governments were addressed in July 1921, and provisional views of the
Government of India were published for general information. The advisability of
legislation had been accepted by the great majority of Local Governments and of
employers’ and workers’ associations and the Government of India believed that
public opinion generally is in favour of legislation. In June, 1922 a committee was
convened to consider the question. After considering the numerous replies and
opinions received by the Government of India, the committee was unanimously in
favour of legislation, and drew up detailed recommendations. On the
recommendations of the committee the Workmen’s Compensation Bill was
introduced in the Legislature.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS
The general principles of workmen’s compensation command almost
universal acceptance and India is now nearly alone among civilised countries in
being without legislation embodying those principles. For a number of years the
more generous employers have been in the habit of giving compensation
voluntarily, but this practice is by no means general. The growing complexity of
industry in this country, with the increasing use of machinery and consequent
danger to workmen, along with the comparative poverty of the workmen
themselves, renders it advisable that they should be protected, as far as possible
from hardship arising from accidents.
An additional advantage of legislation of this type is that by increasing the
importance for the employer of adequate safety devices, it reduces the number of
accidents to workmen in a manner that cannot be achieved by official inspection.
Further, the encouragement given to employers to provide adequate medical
treatment for their workmen should mitigate the effects of such accidents as do
occur. The benefits so conferred on the workman added to the increased sense

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
of security which he will enjoy, should render industrial life more attractive and
thus increase the available supply of labour. At the same time, a corresponding
increase in the efficiency of the average workman may be expected. A system of
insurance would prevent time burden from pressing too heavily on any particular
employer.
After a detailed examination of the question by the Government of India,
Local Governments were addressed in July 1921, and provisional views of the
Government of India were published for general information. The advisability of
legislation has been accepted by the great majority of Local Governments and ‘at
employers’ and workers’ association and the Government of India believe that
public opinion generally is in favour of legislation.
In June 1922, a committee was convened to consider the question. This
committee was composed, for the most part of members of the Imperial
Legislature. After considering the numerous replies and opinions received by the
Government of India, the committee was unanimously in favour of legislation and
drew up detailed recommendations regarding the lines which in its opinion such
legislation should follow. The Bill now presented follows these recommendations
closely. A number of supplementary provisions have been added where
necessary, but practically no variations of importance have been made.
The Bill contains two distinct proposals. In Chapter II modifications are made
in the ordinary civil law affecting the liability of employers for the damages in
respect of injuries sustained by their workmen; these clauses will operate only in
actions before the ordinary civil courts. The main part of the Bill makes provisions
for workmen’s compensation and sets up special machinery to deal with claims
falling under this category.
Both parts of the Bill, however, apply to the same classes of workmen. If the
scope of the employers’ liability clauses was made wider than the scope of the
workmen’s compensation provisions, there would be considerable danger of a
great increase in litigation. The classes included are those whose inclusion was
recommended by the committee, and are specified in Schedule II. Two criteria
have been followed in the determination of the classes to be included—
(1) that the Bill should be confined to industries which are more or less
organised;
(2) that only workmen whose occupation is hazardous should be included.
The general principle is that the compensation should ordinarily be given to
workmen who sustained personal injuries by accidents arising out of and in the

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

course of their employment. Compensation will also be given in certain limited
circumstances for disease. The actual rates of compensation payable are based
on the unanimous recommendation of the committee. They are in every case
subject to fixed maxima, in accordance with the committee’s recommendations. It
should be remembered, however, that the more highly paid workmen will be
enabled in cases to which the employers’ liability clauses will apply, to obtain
damages on a scale considerably in excess of the maximum fixed for workmen’s
compensation.
A consistent endeavour has been made to give as little opportunity for
disputes as possible. Throughout the Bill in the definitions adopted the scales
selected, and the exceptions permitted the great aim has been precision in order
that in as few cases as possible should the validity of a claim for compensation or
the amount of that claim be open to doubt. At the same time, on the unanimous
recommendation of the committee provision has been made for special Tribunal
to deal cheaply and expeditiously with any disputes that may arise, and generally
to assist the parties in a manner which is not possible for the ordinary civil courts.
ACT 8 OF 1923
The Workmen’s Compensation Bill having been passed by the Legislature
received its assent on the 5th March, 1923. It came into force on 1st day of July,
1924 as THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 (8 of 1923).
LIST OF AMENDING ACTS AND ADAPTATION ORDERS
1. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1924 (7 of 1924).
2. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1925 (37 of 1925).
3. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1926 (29 of 1926).
4. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1929 (5 of 1929).
5. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1933 (15 of 1933).
6. The Government of India (Adaptation of Indian Laws) Order, 1937.
7. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1937 (7 of 1937).
8. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1938 (9 of 1938).
9. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1939 (13 of 1939).
10. The Workmen’s Compensation (Second Amendment) Act, 1939 (42 of 1939).
11. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1942 (1 of 1942).
12. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1946 (1 of 1946).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
13. The Indian Independence (Adaptation of Central Acts and Ordinances)
Order, 1948.
14. The Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950.
15. The Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 (3 of 1951).
16. The Adaptation of Laws (No. 3} Order, 1956.
17. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1957 (36 of 1957).
18. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1959 (8 of 1959).
19. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1960 (58 of 1960).
20. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1962 {64 of 1962).
21. The Central Labour Laws {Extension to Jammu and Kashmir) Act, 1970 (51
of 1970).
22. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1976 (65 of 1976).
23. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1984 (22 of 1984).
24. The Delegated Legislation Provisions (Amendment) Act, 1985 ( 4 of 1986).
25. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1995 (30 of 1995).
26. The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2000 (46 of 2000).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT, 19231
(8 of 1923)
[5th March, 1923]
An Act to provide for the payment by certain classes of employers to their
workmen of compensation for injury by accident.
whereas it is expedient to provide for the payment by certain classes of
employers to their workmen of compensation for injury by accident; It is hereby
enacted as follows:—
CHAPTER I
PRELIMINARY
1. Short title, extent and commencement.—
(1) This Act may be called the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923.
2[(2) It extends to the whole of India 3[***]].
(3) It shall come into force on the first day of July, 1924.
2. Definitions.—
(1) In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,—
4[***]
(b) “Commissioner” means a Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation
appointed under section 20;
(c) “compensation” means compensation as provided for by this Act;
5[(d)“dependant” means any of the following relatives of deceased
workman, namely:—
It is well-settled that the Act is a piece of social security and welfare
legislation. Its dominant purpose is to protect the workman and, therefore, the
provisions of the Act should not be interpreted too narrowly so as to debar the

1 For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Gazette of India, 1922, Pt. V, p. 313, and for
Report of Joint Committee, see Gazette of India, 1923, Pt, V, p. 37.
2 Subs, by the A.O. 1950, for sub-section (2).
3 The words “except the State of Jammu and Kashmir” omitted by Act 51 of 1970, sec. 2 and
Sch. (w.e.f. 1-9-1971).
4 Clause (a) omitted by Act 8 of 1959, sec, 2 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
5 Subs, by Act S of 1959, sec. 2, for clause (d) (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
workman from compensation which the Parliament thought they ought to have.
The intention of the Legislature was to make the employer an insurer of the
workman responsible against the loss caused by the injuries or death, which
ought to have happened, while the workman was engaged in his work; Sunita
Devi v. Autar Singh, (2004) 104 FJK 1007 (Jhar)
(i) a widow, a minor 1[legitimate or adopted] son, an unmarried 2[legitimate or
adopted] daughter or a widowed mother; and
(ii) if wholly dependant on the earnings of the workman at the time of his death, a
son or a daughter who has attained the age of 18 years and who is infirm;
(iii) if wholly or in part dependant on the earnings of the workman at the time of
his death,—
(a) a widower,
(b) a parent other than a widowed mother,
(c) a minor illegitimate son, an unmarried illegitimate daughter or a daughter
3[legitimate or illegitimate or adopted] if married and a minor or if widowed
and a minor,
(d) a minor brother or an unmarried sister or a widowed sister if a minor,
(e) a widowed daughter-in-law,
(f) a minor child of a pre-deceased son,
(g) a minor child of a pre-deceased daughter where no parent of the child is
alive, or
(h) a paternal grandparent if no parent of the workman is alive;]
4[Explanation.—For the purposes of sub-clause (ii) and items (f) and (g) of subclause
(iii) references to a son, daughter or child include an adopted son,
daughter or child respectively.]
(e) “employer” includes any body of persons whether incorporated or not and
any managing agent of an employer and the legal representative of a
deceased employer, and, when the services of a workman are temporarily
lent or let on hire to another person by the person with whom the workman
has entered into a contract of service or apprenticeship, means such other
person while the workman is working for him;


16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

(f) “managing agent” means any person appointed or acting as the
representative of another person for the purpose of carrying on such other
person’s trade or business, but does not include an individual manager
subordinate to an employer;
1[(ff) “minor” means a person who has not attained the age of eighteen years;]
(g) “partial disablement” means, where the disablement is of a temporary
nature, such disablement as reduces the earning capacity of a workman in
any employment in which he was engaged at the time of the accident
resulting in the disablement, and, where the disablement is of a permanent
nature, such disablement as reduces his earning capacity in every
employment which he was capable of undertaking at that time: provided that
every injury specified 2[in Part II of Schedule I] shall be deemed to result in
permanent partial disablement;
(h) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
(i) “qualified medical practitioner” means any person registered 3[***] under
any 4[Central Act, Provincial Act, or an Act of the Legislature of a 5[State]]
providing for the maintenance of a register of medical practitioners, or, in any
area where no such last-mentioned Act is in force, any person declared by
the State Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, to be a qualified
medical practitioner for the purposes of this Act;
6[***]
(k) “seaman” means any person forming part of the crew of any 7[***] ship, but
does not include the master of 8[the] ship; (1) “total disablement” means such
such disablement, whether of a temporary or permanent nature, as
incapacitates a workman for all work which he was capable of performing at
the time of the accident resulting in such disablement:

1 Ins. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959),
2 Subs. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 2, for “in Schedule I” (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
3 Certain words omitted by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
4 Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for the words “Act of the Central Legislature or of any Legislature in a
Province of India”.
5 Subs. by the A.O. (No. 3) Order, 1956, for “Part A State or Part B State”.
6 Clause (j) omitted by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 2.
7 The word “registered” omitted by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 2.
8 Subs. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 2, for “any such”.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
1[Provided that permanent total disablement shall be deemed to result from
every injury specified in Part 1 of Schedule I or from any combination of
injuries specified in Part II thereof where the aggregate percentage of the loss
of earning capacity, as specified in the said Part II against those injuries,
amounts to one hundred per cent, or more;]
(m) “wages”, includes any privilege or benefit which is capable of being
estimated in money, other than a travelling allowance or the value of any
travelling concession or a contribution paid by the employer of a workman
towards any pension or provident fund or a sum paid to a workman to cover
any special expenses entailed on him by the nature of his employment;
(n) “workman” means any person 2[***] who is—
(i) a railway servant as defined in 3[clause (34) of section 2 of the Railways
Act, 1989 (24 of 1989)] not permanently employed in any administrative,
district or sub-divisional office of a railway and not employed in any such
capacity as is specified in Schedule II, or 4[(ia)
(a) a master, seaman or other member of the crew of a ship,
(b) a captain or other member of the crew of an aircraft,
(c) a person recruited as driver, helper, mechanic, cleaner or in any other
capacity in connection with a motor vehicle,
(d) a person recruited for work abroad by a company, and who is
employed outside India in any such capacity as is specified in
Schedule II and the ship, aircraft or motor vehicle, or company, as the
case may be, is registered in India, or;]
(ii) employed 5[***] 6[***] in any such capacity as is specified in Schedule II,
whether the contract of employment was made before or after the passing
of this Act and whether such contract is expressed or implied, oral or in
writing; but does not include any person working in the capacity of a
member of 7[the Armed Forces of the Union] 1[***]; and any reference to a

1 Subs. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 2, for the proviso (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
2 Certain words omitted by Act 46 of 2000, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 8-12-2000).
3 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 2, for “section 3 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (9 of 1890)”
(w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
4 Ins. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
5 The words “either by way of manual labour or” omitted by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 2.
6 The words “on monthly wages not exceeding one thousand rupees” omitted by Act 22 of 1984,
sec. 2 (w.e.f. 1-7-1984).
7 Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for “His Majesty’s naval military or air forces”.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

a workman who has been injured shall, where the workman is dead,
include a reference to his dependants or any of them.
(2) The exercise and performance of the powers and duties of a local authority or
of any department 2[acting on behalf of the Government] shall, for the
purposes of this Act, unless a contrary intention appears, be deemed to be
the trade or business of such authority or department.
3[(3) The Central Government or the State Government, by notification in the
Official Gazette, after giving not less than three months’ notice of its intention
so to do, may, by a like notification, add to Schedule II any class of persons
employed in any occupation which it is satisfied is a hazardous occupation,
and the provisions of this Act shall thereupon apply, in case of a notification
by the Central Government, within the territories to which the Act extends, or,
in the case of a notification by the State Government, within the State, to
such classes of persons:
Provided that in making addition, the Central Government or the State
Government, as the case may be, may direct that the provisions of this Act
shall apply to such classes of persons in respect of specified injuries only.]
Basis for calculation of compensation
The basis for calculation of compensation is monthly “wages”; Zubeda Bano
v. Maharashtra Road Transport Corporation, 1990 LLR 287 (Bom).
“Batta” does not amount to “wages” for computing compensation
“Batta” paid to a workman per day to cover special expenses incurred by him
due to nature of his employment does not amount to “wages” for the purposes of
computing compensation; New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Hyderabad v. Kotam
Appa Rao, 1995 LLR 609 (AP).
Conditions for treating a person as workman
From the definition of ‘workman’ given in section 2 (1) (n) of the Act, it is clear
that for not treating a person as workman, two conditions are required to be
proved namely that his employment is of casual nature and he is not employed
for the purpose of employee’s trade or business and the onus is on the employer
to prove these conditions; Mangala Ben v. Dalip Motwani, 1998 LLR 656,

1 The words “or of the Royal Indian Marine Service” omitted by the A.O, 1937.
2 Subs. by the A.O. 1937, for “of the Government”.
3 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 2, for sub-section (3) (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
Power of Commissioner to award more compensation
The Commissioner has power to award compensation more than what is
claimed by the workman if the facts do warrant such an award; Karnataka State
Road Transport Corporation v. B.T. Somasekharaiah, 1994 LLR 251 (Karn).
Salesman in arrack shop is a workman
A salesman in an arrack shop is a ‘workman’ in view of clause (iii) of
Schedule II as defined under section 2 (1) (n) of the Act; Matheto Joseph v. johay
Sunny, 1995 LLR 390 (Ker),
Workman does not include his heirs and legal representatives
The workman defined in section 2 (1) (n) of the Act does not include any of
his heirs and legal representatives; Sumuben v. Patel Industries, 1994 LLR
338 (Guj).
CHAPTER II
WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION
3. Employer’s liability for compensation.—
(1) If personal injury is caused to a workman by accident arising out of and in the
course of his employment, his employer shall be liable to pay compensation
in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter:
Provided that the employer shall not be so liable —
(a) in respect of any injury which does not result in the total or partial
disablement of the workman for a period exceeding 1[three] days;
(b) in respect of any 2[injury, not resulting in death 3[or permanent total
disablement] caused by] an accident which is directly attributable to—
(i) the workman having been at the time thereof under the influence of
drink or drugs, or
(ii) the wilful disobedience of the workman to an order expressly given, or
to a rule expressly framed, for the purpose of securing the safety of
workmen, or
(iii) the wilful removal or disregard by the workman of any safety guard or
other device which he knew to have been provided for the purpose of
securing the safety of workman, 4[***].

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

1[***]
2[(2)If a workman employed in any employment specified in Part A of Schedule III
contracts any disease specified therein as an occupational disease peculiar
to that employment, or if a workman, whilst in the service of an employer in
whose service he has been employed for a continuous period of not less than
six months (which period shall not include a period of service under any other
employer in the same kind of employment) in any employment specified in
Part B of Schedule III, contracts any disease specified therein as an
occupational disease peculiar to that employment, or if a workman whilst in
the service of one or more employers in any employment specified in Part C
of Schedule III for such continuous period as the Central Government may
specify in respect of each such employment, contracts any disease specified
therein as an occupational disease peculiar to that employment, the
contracting of the disease shall be deemed to be an injury by accident within
the meaning of this section and, unless the contrary is provided, the accident
shall be deemed to have arisen out of, and in the course of, the employment:
3[Provided that if it is proved,—
(a) that a workman whilst in the service of one or more employers in any
employment specified in Part C of Schedule II has contracted a disease
specified therein as an occupational disease peculiar to that employment
during a continuous period which is less than the period specified under
this sub-section for that employment; and
(b) that the disease has arisen out of and in the course of the employment,
the contracting of such disease shall be deemed to be an injury by
accident within the meaning of this section:
Provided further that if it is proved that a workman who having served
under any employer in any employment specified in Part B of Schedule III
or who having served under one or more employers in any employment
specified in Part C of that Schedule, for a continuous period specified
under this sub-section for that employment and he has after the cessation
of such service contracted any disease specified in the said Part B or the
said Part C, as the case may be, as an occupational disease peculiar to
the employment and that such disease arose out of the employment, the

1 Clause (c) omitted by Act 5 of 1929, sec. 2.
2 Subs. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 3, for sub-sections (2) and (3) (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
3 Ins. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 3 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
contracting of the disease shall be deemed to be an injury by accident
within the meaning of this section.]
1[(2A) If a workman employed in any employment specified in Part C of Schedule
III contracts any occupational disease peculiar to that employment, the
contracting whereof is deemed to be an injury by accident within the meaning
of this section, and such employment was under more than one employer, all
such employers shall be liable for the payment of the compensation in such
proportion as the Commissioner may, in the circumstances, deem just.]
(3) 2[The Central Government or the State Government], by notification in the
Official Gazette, after giving, not less than three months’ notice of its intention
so to do, may, by a like notification, add any description of employment to the
employments specified in Schedule III and shall specify in the case of
employments so added the diseases which shall be deemed for the purposes
of this section to be occupational diseases peculiar to those employments
respectively, and thereupon the provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply 3[in
the case of a notification by the Central Government, within the territories to
which this Act extends, or, in case of a notification by the State Government,
within the State] 4[***] as if such diseases had been declared by this Act to be
occupational diseases peculiar to those employments.]
(4) Save as provided by 5[sub-seclions (2), (2A)] and (3), no compensation shall
be payable to a workman in respect of any disease unless the disease is
6[***] directly attributable to a specific injury by accident arising out of and in
the course of his employment.
(5) Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to confer any right to
compensation on a workman in respect of any injury if he has instituted in a
Civil Court a suit for damages in respect of the injury against the employer or
any other person; and no suit for damages shall be maintainable by a
workman in any court of law in respect of any injury—
(a) if he has instituted a claim to compensation in respect of the injury before
a Commissioner; or

1 Subs. by Act 64 of 1962, sec.3, for sub-section (2A) (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
2 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 3, for certain words (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
3 Ins. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 3 (w.e.f 15-9-1995).
4 Certain words omilted by Act 51 of 1970, sec. 2 and Sch. (w.e.l 1-9-1971).
5 Subs. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 3, for “sub-section (2)” (w.e,f. 1-6-1959).
6 The words “solely and” omitted by Act 15 o/ 1933, sec. 3.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

(b) if an agreement has been come to between the workman and his
employer providing for the payment of compensation in respect of the
injury in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
Connection between accident and employment
The deceased employee while travelling by public transport to his place of
work met with a fatal accident. Nothing has been brought on record that the
employee was not obliged to travel in any particular manner under the terms of
the employment nor he was travelling in the official transport. Held, no casual
connection between accident and employment could be established. Hence, the
claimant is not entitled to any compensation; State Bank of India v. Vijay Laxmi,
1998 LLR 319.
Death during the course of employment
If the deceased employee met with his death while he was going to his place
of work and the death has arisen during the course of employment, then the
employer is liable for compensation; T.N.C.S. Corporation Ltd. v. s. Poomalai,
1995 LLR 63 (Mad): 1995 I LLJ HC MDS (378).
Entitlement to claim compensation
Where death was accelerated on account of stress and strain of the working
condition, it is not necessary that there should be a direct connection between
the cause of death and the nature of duties. Even if a casual connection between
the two can be shown then the dependants of the deceased would be entitled to
claim compensation from the employer; Divisional Personal Officer, Western
Railway v. Asluya Segam, 1994 LLR 11 (Raj).
Injury must be physical injury
Injury sustained by a workman must be a physical injury on account of
accident; Leela Devi v. Ramlal Rahu, 1990 LLR 213 (HP).
Liability for compensation
(i) In order to attract section 3 (1) of the Act, following three conditions must be
fulfilled:—
(a) personal injury;
(b) accident; and
(c) arising out of and in the course of employment; Kalayni P. v. Divisional
Manager, Southern Railway (Personal Branch), Divisional Office, Madras,
2004 LLR 207 (Mad HC): 2004 1 LLJ 49.
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(ii) It is no doubt true that in order to succeed in an application for getting
compensation under section 3 of the Act the following points are required to
be established:—
(1) that the accident must arise out of and in the course of the workman’s
employment;
(2) there must be causal connection between the injury and the accident and
the work done in the course of the employment;
(3) the workman has to say that while doing a part of his duty or incidental
thereto it has resulted into an accident.
It is necessary that the workman must be actually working at the time of the
injury or the accident. Therefore, the three factors, that there must be injury,
which must be caused in an accident, it must be caused in the course of and out
of the employment must be established; Branch Manager, New India Assurance
Co. Ltd. v. Siddappa, Major, 2004 LLR 731 (Kant HC).
Meaning of the expression “arising out of employment”
(i) The expression “arising out of employment” means that there must be casual
relationship between the accident and the employment. If the accident has
occurred on account of ihe risk which is an incident of employment, it has to
be held that the accident has arisen out of the employment; Oriental
Insurance Co. Lid. v. Nanguli Singh, 1995 LLJ HC ORS (298).
(ii) The words “ouf of employment” is not limited to mere nature of the
employment, but it (arising out of employment) applies to its nature, its
conditions and obligations and its incidents. An accident which occurs on
account of a risk, which is an incident of employment, then the claim for
compensation can succeed provided the workman has not exposed himself
to an added peril by his own imprudent act; Executive Engineer 19th Div.
R.C.P., Bikancr v. Heeraram, 1982 (44) RR 179 Raj: 1980 Raj LW 412.
1[4. Amount of compensation.—
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the amount of compensation shall be as
follows, namely:—
(a) Where death results from the injury
an amount equal to 2[fifty per cent.] of the monthly wages of the deceased
workman multiplied by the relevant factor; or
an amount of 1[2[eighty thousand rupees]], whichever is more;


16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

(b) Where total permanent disablement results from the injury
an amount equal to 3[sixty per cent.] of the monthly wages of the injured
workman multiplied by the relevant factor; or
an amount of 4[5[ninety thousand rupees]], whichever is more;
Explanation 1.—For the purposes of clause (a) and clause (b) “relevant factor”
in relation to a workman means the factor specified in the second column of
Schedule IV against the entry in the first column of that Schedule specifying the
number of years which are the same as the completed years of the age of the
workman on his last birthday immediately preceding the date on which the
compensation fell due.
Explanation II.—Where the monthly wages of a workman exceed 6[four thousand
rupees], his monthly wages for the purposes of clause (a) and clause (b) shall be
deemed to be 7[four thousand rupees] only;
(c) Where permanent partial disablement result from the injury
(i) i n the case of an injury specified in Part II of Schedule 1, such
percentage of the compensation which would have been payable in
thecase of permanent total disablement as is specified therein as
being the percentage of the loss of earning capacity caused by that
injury; and
(ii) in the case of an injury not specified in Schedule I, such percentage of
the compensation payable in the case of permanent total disablement
as is proportionate to the loss of earning capacity (as assessed by the
qualified medical practitioner) permanently caused by the injury;
Explanation I.—Where more injuries than one are caused by the same accident,
the amount of compensation payable under this head shall be aggregated but not
so in any case as to exceed the amount which would have been payable if
permanent total disablement had resulted from the injuries.
Explanation II.—In assessing the loss of earning capacity for the purpose of
sub-clause (ii), the qualified medical practitioner shall have due regard to the



16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
percentages of loss of earning capacity in relation to different injuries specified in
Schedule I;
(d) Where temporary disablement whether totals or partial results from the
injury
a half monthly payment of the sum equivalent to twenty-five per cent of
monthly wages of the workman, to be paid in accordance with the provisions
of sub-section (2).
1[(1A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (l), while fixing the
amount of compensation payable to a workman is respect of an accident
occurred outside India, the Commissioner shall take into account the amount
of compensation, if any, awarded to such workman in accordance with the
law of the country in which the accident occurred and shall reduce the
amount fixed by him by the amount of compensation awarded to the
workman in accordance with the law of that country.]
(2) The half-monthly payment referred to in clause (d) of sub-section (I) shall be
payable on the sixteenth day —
(i) from the date of disablement where such disablement lasts for a period of
twenty-eight days or more, or
(ii) after the expiry of a waiting period of three days from the date of
disablement where such disablement lasts for a period of less than
twenty- eight days; and thereafter half-monthly during the disablement or
during a period of five years, whichever period is shorter:
Provided that—
(a) there shall be deducted from any lump sum or half-monthly payments
to which the workman is entitled the amount of any payment or
allowance which the workman has received from the employer by way
of compensation during the period of disablement prior to the receipt
of such lump sum or of the first half-monthly payment, as the case
may be; and
(b) no half-monthly payment shall in any case exceed the amount, if any,
by which half the amount of the monthly wages of the workman before
the accident exceeds half the amount of such wages which he is
earning after the accident.

1 Ins. by Ac( 30 of 1995, sec. 4 (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

Explanation.—Any payment or allowance which the workman has received from
the employer towards his medical treatment shall not be deemed to be a
payment or allowance received by him by way of compensation within the
meaning of clause (a) of the proviso.
(3) On the ceasing of the disablement before the date on which any half-monthly
payment falls due there shall be payable in respect of that half-month a sum
proportionate to the duration of the disablement in that half-month.]
1[(4) If the injury of the workman results in his death, the employer shall, in
addition to the compensation under sub-section (1), deposit with the
Commissioner a sum of 2[two thousand and five hundred rupees] for payment
of the same to the eldest surviving dependant of the workman towards the
expenditure of the funeral of such workman or where the workman did not
have a dependant or was not living with his dependant at the time of his
death to the person who actually incurred such expenditure.]
Assessment of loss of earning capacity by the qualified medical
practitioner
The incorporation of words “assessment of loss of earning capacity by the
qualified medical practitioner” in section 4 (1) (c) (ii) have some purpose and it is
not a case of ambiguity at all. So long as there is no provision which enables the
Commissioner to determine the compensation ignoring the medical practitioner’s
report, there is no question of avoiding it by Commissioner unless he wants a
second report from the Medical Board; New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v.
Sreedharan, 1995 LLR 376 (Ker).
Interference by High Court
The interference by High Court with the order of recall by Commissioner for
Workmen’s Compensation on the ground of fraud by workman is unjustified both
on fact and the law; Roshan Deen v. Preeti Lot, AIR 2002 SC 33.
3[4A. Compensation to be paid when due and penalty for default.—
(1) Compensation under section 4 shall be paid as soon as it falls due.


Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(2) In cases where the employer does not accept the liability for compensation to
the extent claimed, he shall be bound to make provisional payment based on
the extent of liability which he accepts, and, such payment shall be deposited
with the Commissioner or made to the workman, as the case may be, without
prejudice to the right of the workman to make any further claim.
1[(3) Where any employer is in default in paying the compensation due under this
Act within one month from the date it fell due, the Commissioner shall—
(a) direct that the employer shall, in addition to the amount of the arrears, pay
simple interest thereon at the rate of twelve per cent per annum or at
such higher rate not exceeding the maximum of the lending rates of any
scheduled bank as may be specified by the Central Government, by
notification in the Official Gazette, on the amount due; and
(b) if, in his opinion, there is no justification for the delay, direct that the
employer shall, in addition to the amount of the arrears, and interest
thereon pay a further sum not exceeding fifty per cent of such amount by
way of penalty:
Provided that an order for the payment of penalty shall not be passed under
clause (b) without giving a reasonable opportunity to the employer to show
cause why it should not be passed.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, “scheduled bank” means a
bank for the time being included in the Second Schedule to the Reserve Bank of
India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934).
2[(3A) The interest and the penalty payable under sub-section (3) shall be paid to
the workman or his dependant, as the case may be.]]
Defaulting employer to pay additional amount of compensation
Sub-section (3) of section 4A read with clauses (a) and (b) thereof, makes it
clear that additional amount of compensation can be levied against the defaulting
employer by way of penalty if it is shown that there is no justification for the delay
on his part in making good the compensation amount to the claimant; Ved
Prakash Garg v, Premi Devi, JT 1997 (8) SC 229.
Delayed payment or deposit of compensation entails interest as well as
penalty

1 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 5, for sub-section (3) (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
2 Subs. by Act 46 of 2000, sec. 4, for sub-section (3A) (w.e.f. 8-12-2000),
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

Delayed payment or deposit of compensalion entails interest @ 6 % p.a. as
well as penalty not exceeding 50% of the amount; jayanti Lal & Co, v. Garesia
Rajvirba, (1992) 1 Lab 1C 1225 (Guj).
Payment of compensation either to the workman or to deposit it with
the Commissioner
Section 4A (2) makes it clear that, in the first place, the employer has to
accept the extent of his liability for payment of compensation and on that basis
he has to make payment either to the workman or to deposit with the
Commissioner. The requirement of this sub-section is payment to the workman
and not to any other person including his heirs and legal representatives. It takes
within its sweep the case where the workman has not breathed his last on
account of the accident met with by him in the course of his employment;
Sumuben v. Patel Industries, 1994 LLR 338 (Guj).
Sub-section (3) of section 4A is a beneficial provision
It is apparent that sub-section (3) of section 4A is beneficial provision made
for the benefit of the employee, having regard to the scheme of the Act, the
provision for payment of interest and of penalty have been enacted with a view to
deter the employer from taking pleas and avoiding payment of the compensation
which becomes payable; Divisional Forest Officer v. Baijanti Bai, 1995 I LLJ MP
(837),
Sub-section (3) of section 4A is not applicable for fixing rate of interest
in a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Section 4A(3) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act is not applicable in the
matter of fixing rate of interest in a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act; Abati
Bezbaruah v. Dy. Director General, GSl, (2003) 3 SCC 148.
5. Method of calculating wages.—1[***] 2[In this Act and for the purposes
thereof the expression “monthly wages” means the amount of wages deemed
to be payable for a month’s service (whether the wages are payable by the
month or by whatever other period or at piece rates), and calculated] as
follows, namely:—
(a) where the workman has, during a continuous period of not less than
twelve months immediately preceding the accident, been in the service of

1 The brackets and figure “(1)” omitted by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 4.
2 Subs. by Act 13 of 1939, sec. 2, for “For the purposes of this Act the monthly wages of a
workman shall be calculated” (w.r.c.f. 30-6-1934).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
the employer who is liable to pay compensation, the monthly wages of the
workman shall be one-twelfth of the total wages which have fallen due for
payment to him by the employer in the last twelve months of that period;
1[(b)where the whole of the continuous period of service immediately
preceding the accident diiring which the workman was in the service of
the employer who is liable to pay the compensation was less than one
month, the monthly wages of the workman shall be 2[***] the average
monthly amount which, during the twelve months immediately preceding
the accident, was being earned by a workman employed on the same
work by the same employer, or, if there was no workman so employed, by
a workman employed on similar work in the same locality;]
3[(c)] 4[in other cases [including cases in which it is not possible for want of
necessary information to calculate the monthly wages under clause (b)]],
the monthly wages shall be thirty times the total wages earned in respect
of the last continuous period of service immediately preceding the
accident from the employer who is liable to pay compensation, divided by
the number of days comprising, such period.
5[***]
Explariation.—A period of service shall, for the purposes of 6[this 7[section]] be
deemed to be continuous which has not been interrupted by a period of absence
from work exceeding fourteen days.
8[***]
6. Review.—
(1) Any half-monthly payment payable under this Act, either under an agreement
between the parties or under the order of a Commissioner, may be reviewed
by the Commissioner, on the application either of the employer or of the
workman accompanied by the certificate of a qualified medical practitioner

1 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 5.
2 The words “deemed to be” omitted by Act 13 of 1939, sec. 2 (w.r.e.f. 30-6-1934).
3 Clause (b) re-lettered as clause (c) by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 5.
4 Subs. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 6, for “in other cases” (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
5 Proviso omitted by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 5.
6 Subs. by Act 5 of 1929, sec. 3, for “this section”.
7 Subs. by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 4, for “sub-section”.
8 Sub-section (2) added by Act 5 of 1929, sec, 3 and omitted by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 5.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

that there has been a change in the condition of the workman or, subject to
rules made under this Act, on application made without such certificate.
(2) Any half-monthly payment may, on review under this section, subject to the
provisions of this Act, be continued, increased, decreased or ended, or, if the
accident is found to have resulted in permanent disablement, be converted to
the lump sum to which the workman is entitled less any amount which he has
already received by way of half-monthly payments.
7. Commutation of half-monthly payments.—Any right to receive halfmonthly
payments may, by agreement between the parties or, if the parties
cannot agree and the payments have been continued for not Jess than six
months, on the application of either party to the Commissioner, be redeemed
by the payment of a lump sum of such amount as may be agreed to by the
parties or determined by the Commissioner, as the case may be.
8. Distribution of compensation.—
1[(1) No payment of compensation in respect of a workman whose injury has
resulted in death, and no payment of a lump sum as compensation to a
woman or a person under a legal disability, shall be made otherwise than by
deposit with the Commissioner, and no such payment made directly by an
employer shall be deemed to be a payment of compensation:
2[Provided that, in the case of a deceased workman, an employer may make
to any dependant advances on account of compensation 3[of an amount
equal to three months’ wages of such workman and so much of such amount]
as does not exceed the compensation payable to that dependant shall be
deducted by the Commissioner from such compensation and repaid to the
employer.]
(2) Any other sum amounting to not less than ten rupees which is payable as
compensation may be deposited with the Commissioner on behalf of the
person entitled thereto.
(3) The receipt of the Commissioner shall be a sufficient discharge in respect of
any compensation deposited with him.]


16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(4) On the deposit of any money under sub-section (1), 1[as compensation in
respect of a deceased workman] the Commissioner 2[***] shall, if he thinks
necessary, cause notice to be published or to be served on each dependant
in such manner as he thinks fit, calling upon the dependants to appear before
him on such date as he may fix for determining the distribution of the
compensation. If the Commissioner is satisfied after any inquiry which he
may deem necessary, that no dependant exists, he shall repay the balance of
the money to the employer by whom it was paid. The Commissioner shall, on
application by the employer, furnish a statement showing in detail all
disbursements made.
3[(5) Compensation deposited in respect of a deceased workman shall, subject to
any deduction made under sub-section (4), be apportioned among the
dependants of the deceased workman or any of them in such proportion as
the Commissioner thinks fit, or may, in the discretion of the Commissioner, be
allotted to any one dependant.
(6) Where any compensation deposited with the Commissioner is payable to any
person, the Commissioner shall, if the person to whom the compensation is
payable is not a woman or a person under a legal disability, and may, in other
cases, pay the money to the person entitled thereto.
(7) Where any lump sum deposited with the Commissioner is payable to a
woman or a person under a legal disability, such sum may be invested,
applied or otherwise dealt with for the benefit of the woman, or of such
person during his disability, in such manner as the Commissioner may direct;
and where a half-monthly payment is payable to any person under a legal
disability, the Commissioner may, of his own motion or on an application
made to him in this behalf, order that the payment be made during the
disability to any dependant of the workman or to any other person, whom the
Commissioner thinks best fitted to provide for the welfare of the workman.]
4[(8)] Where an application made to him in this behalf or otherwise, the
Commissioner is satisfied that, on account of neglect of children on the part
of a parent or on account of the variation of the circumstances of any
dependant or for any other sufficient cause, an order of the Commissioner as


16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

to the distribution of any sum paid as compensation or as to the manner in
which any sum payable to any such dependant is to be invested, applied or
otherwise dealt with, ought to be varied, The Commissioner may make such
orders for the variation of the former order as he thinks just in the
circumstances of the case:
Provided that no such order prejudicial to any person shall be made unless
such person has been given an opportunity of showing cause why the order
should not be made or shall be made in any case in which it would involve
the repayment by a dependant of any sum already paid to him.
1[(9) Where the Commissioner varies any order under sub-section (8) by reason
of the fact that payment of compensation to any person has been obtained by
fraud, impersonation or other improper means, any amount so paid to or on
behalf of such person may be recovered in the manner here in after provided
in section 31.]
Employer not to pay compensation directly to the deceased heirs and
legal representatives
No compensation has to be paid in respect of a workman whose injury has
resulted in death except by deposit with the Commissioner and no such payment
made directly by an employer shall be deemed to be a payment of
compensation; the employer should not make any payment of compensation
directly to the deceased’s heirs and legal representatives or to any of them;
Sumuben v. Patel Industries, 1994 LLR 338 (Guj).
Object of section 8
(i) Section 8 of the Act is designed to protect the heirs and legal representatives
of the deceased workman against any kind of exploitation or fraud likely to be
practised on them by or on behalf of the employer or any third party;
Sumuben v. Patel Industries, 1994 LLR 338 (Guj).
(ii) Section 8 of the Act lays down the format for quantum of compensation
payable by an employer when an employee meets with an accident. Its object
is that unscrupulous employer should not take advantage of the ignorance of
the employee in making payment of a paltry sum. Therefore the Act
safeguards the interest of the workers and any private payment will not

1 Ins. by Act 5 of 1929, sec. 4.
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
discharge the statutory obligation; May-field Estate Nalhollah Nilgiris v.
Krishan, 1984 (48) FLR.
9. Compensation not to be assigned, attached or charged.—Save as
provided by this Act no lump sum or half-monthly payment payable under this
Act shall in any way be capable of being assigned or charged or be liable to
attachment or pass to any person other than the workman by operation of law
nor shall any claim be set off against the same.
10. Notice and claim.—
(1) 1[No claim for compensation shall be entertained by a Commissioner unless
notice of the accident has been given in the manner hereinafter provided as
soon as practicable after the happening thereof and unless the claim is
preferred before him within 2[two years] of the occurrence of the accident or
in case of death within 3[two years] from the date of death:]
Provided that where the accident is the contracting of a disease in respect of
which the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 3 are applicable the
accident shall be deemed to have occurred on the first of the days during
which the workman was continuously absent from work in consequence of
the disablement caused by the disease:
4[Provided further that in case of partial disablement due to the contracting of
any such disease and which does not force the workman to absent himself
from work the period of two years shall be counted from the day the workman
gives notice of the disablement to his employer:
Provided further that if a workman who, having been employed in an
employment for a continuous period, specified under sub-section (2) of
section 3 in respect of that employment, ceases to be so employed and
develops symptoms of an occupational disease peculiar to that employment
within two years of the cessation of employment, the accident shall be
deemed to have occurred on the day on which the symptoms were first
detected:]



16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

1[Provided further that the want of or any defect or irregularity in a notice shall
not be a bar to the 2[entertainment of a claim]—
(a) if the claim is 3[preferred] in respect of the death of a workman resulting from
an accident which occurred on the premises of the employer, or at any place
where the workman at the time of the accident was working under the control
of the employer or of any person employed by him, and the workman died on
such premises or at such place, or on any premises belonging to the
employer, or died without having left the vicinity of the premises or place
where the accident occurred, or
(b) if the employer 4[or any one of several employers or any person responsible
to the employer for the management of any branch of the trade or business in
which the injured workman was employed] had knowledge of the accident
from any other source at or about the time when it occurred:]
Provided further that the Commissioner may 5[entertain] and decide any claim
to compensation in any case notwithstanding that the notice has not been
given, or the claim has not been 6[preferred], in due time as provided in this
sub-section, if he is satisfied that the failure so to give the notice or 7[prefer]
the claim, as the case may be, was due to sufficient cause.
(2) Every such notice shall give the name and address of the person injured and
shall state in ordinary language the cause of the injury and the date on which
the accident happened, and shall be served on the employer or upon 8[any
one of] several employers, or upon any person 9[***] responsible to the
employer for the management of any branch of the trade or business in which
the injured workman was employed.
10[(3) The State Government may require that any prescribed class of employers
shall maintain at these premises al which workmen are employed a notice
book, in the prescribed form, which shall be readily accessible at all

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
reasonable times to any injured workman employed on the premises and lo
any person acting bona fide on his behalf.
(4) A notice under this section may be served by delivering it at, or sending it by
registered post addressed to, the residence or any office or place of business
of (he person on whom it is to be served, or, where a notice book is
maintained, by entry in the notice book.]
Liability of insurance company
Insurance company cannot escape liability simply because the notice was not
issued to the Insurance Company. Notice to the owner of the vehicle is good
enough; Ram Karan v. Vijay anand, 1995 LLR 69 (MP).
Posthumous registration for purposes of insurance is an insured
person
An employee suffering employment injury granted posthumous registration
for the purposes of insurance is nonetheless an insured person; Bharagath
Engineering v. R. Raganayaki, (2003) 2 SCC 138.
1[10A. Power to require from employers statements regarding fatal
accidents.—
(1) Where a Commissioner receives information from any source that a workman
has died as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his
employment, he may send by registered post a notice to the workman’s
employer requiring him to submit, within thirty days of the service of the
notice, a statement, in the prescribed form, giving the circumstances
attending the death of the workman, and indicating whether, in the opinion of
the employer, he is or is not liable to deposit compensation on account of the
death.
(2) If the employer is of opinion that he is liable to deposit compensation, he shall
make the deposit within thirty days of the service of the notice.
(3) If the employer is of opinion that he is not liable to deposit compensation, he
shall in his statement indicate the grounds on which he disclaims liability.
(4) Where the employer has so disclaimed liability, the Commissioner, after such
inquiry as he may think fit, may inform any of the dependants of the deceased

1 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 8.
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

workman that it is open to the dependants to prefer a claim for compensation,
and may give them such other further information as he may think fit.
1[10B. Reports of fatal accidents and serious bodily injuries.—
(1) Where, by any law for the time being in force, notice is required to be given to
any authority, by or on behalf of an employer, of any accident occurring on
his premises which results in death 2[or serious bodily injury], the person
required to give the notice shall, within seven days of the death 3[or serious
bodily injury], send a report to the Commissioner giving the circumstances
attending the death 4[or serious bodily injury]:
Provided that where the State Government has so prescribed the person
required to give the notice may instead of sending such report to the
Commissioner send it to the authority to whom he is required to give the
notice.
5[Explanation.—”Serious bodily injury” means an injury which involves, or in all
probability will involve the permanent loss of the use of, or permanent injury to,
any limb, or the permanent loss of or injury to the sight or hearing, or the fracture
of any limb, or the enforced absence of the injured person from work for a period
exceeding twenty days.]
(2) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, extend the
provisions of sub-section (1) to any class of premises other than those
coming within the scope of that sub-section, and may, by such notification,
specify the persons who shall send the report to the Commissioner.]
6[(3) Nothing in this section shall apply to factories to which the Employees’ State
Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), applies.]
11. Medical examination.—
(1) Where a workman has given notice of an accident he shall, if the employer,
before the expiry of three days from the time at which service of the notice
has been effected offers to have him examined free of charge by a qualified
medical practitioner, submit himself of such examination, and any workmen


16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
who is in receipt of a half-monthly payment under this Act shall, if so required,
submit himself for such examination from time to time:
Provided that a workman shall not be required to submit himself for
examination by a medical practitioner otherwise than in accordance with rules
made under this Act, or at more frequent intervals than may be prescribed.
(2) If a workman, on being required to do so by the employer under sub-section
(1) or by the Commissioner at any time, refuses to submit himself for
examination by a qualified medical practitioner or in any way obstructs the
same, his right to compensation shall be suspended during the continuance
of such refusal or obstruction unless, in the case of refusal, he was prevented
by any sufficient cause from so submitting himself.
(3) If a workman, before the expiry of the period within which he is liable under
sub-section (1) to be required to submit himself for medical examination,
voluntarily leaves without having been so examined the vicinity of the place in
which he was employed, his right to compensation shall be suspended until
he returns and offers himself for such examination.
(4) Where a workman, whose right to compensation has been suspended under
sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) dies without having submitted himself for
medical examination as required by either of those sub-sections, the
Commissioner may, if he thinks fit, direct the payment of compensation to the
dependants of the deceased workman.
(5) Where under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) a right to compensation is
suspended, no compensation shall be payable in respect of the period of
suspension, and, if the period of suspension commences before the expiry of
the waiting period referred to in clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 4, the
waiting period shall be increased by the period during which the suspension
continues.
(6) Where an injured workman has refused to be attended by a qualified medical
practitioner whose services have been offered to him by the employer free of
charge or having accepted such offer has deliberately disregarded the
instructions of such medical practitioner, then, 1[if it is proved that the
workman has not thereafter been regularly attended by a qualified medical
pracfitioner or having been so attended has deliberately failed to follow his
instructions and that such refusal, disregard or failure was unreasonable] in

1 Subs, by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 6, for certain words.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

the circumstances of the case and that the injury has been aggravated
thereby, the injury and resulting disablement shall be deemed to be of the
same nature and duration as they might reasonably have been expected to
be if the workman had been regularly attended by a qualified medical
practitioner 1[whose instructions he had followed], and compensation, if any,
shall be payable accordingly.
Determination of loss of earning capacity
Loss of earning capacity has to be determined by taking into account the
diminution or destruction of physical capacity as disclosed by the medical
evidence and then it has to be seen to what extent such diminution or destruction
should reasonably be taken to have disabled the affected workman of his class
ordinarily performs. The medical evidence as to physical capacity is an important
factor in the assessment of loss of earning capacity, in the absence of medical
evidence by doctors examining the claimant on behalf of either side, it is difficult
to measure the physical disability of the claimant and thus also the diminution or
otherwise of the earning capacity; Bengal Coal Co, Ltd. v. Barium Gopel, 1983 II
LLJ 86 Cal.
Medical examination
(i) It is the responsibility of the employer to press for medical examination of the
workman receiving injuries in an accident; Madhya Pradesh Mining
Corporation v. Munda Kol, 1990 l.LK 115 (MP).
(ii) No doubt section 11 provides that medical examination can be ordered by the
Commissioner under the Workmen’s Compensation Act but it has been held
that it is the responsibility of the employer to press for the medical
examination of the workman; Madhya Pradesh Mining Corporation through
Manager Mines, Satve v. Munda Kol Son of Kutti, 1990 LLR 115 (MP).
12. Contracting.—
(1) Where any person (hereinafter in this section referred to as the principal) in
the course of or for the purposes of his trade or business contracts with any
other person (hereinafter in this section referred to as the contractor for the
execution by or under the contractor of the whole or any part of any work

1 Ins. by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 6.
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
which is ordinarily part of the trade or business of the principal, the principal
shall be liable to pay to any workman employed in the execution of the work
any compensation which he would have been liable to pay if that workman
had been immediately employed by him; and where compensation is claimed
from the principal, this Act shall apply as if references to the principal were
substituted for references to the employer except that the amount of
compensation shall be calculated with reference to the wages of the workman
under the employer by whom he is immediately employed.
(2) Where the principal is liable to pay compensation under this section, he shall
be entitled to be indemnified by the contractor, 1[or any other person from
whom the workman could have recovered compensation and where a
contractor who is himself a principal is liable to pay compensation or to
indemnify a principal under this section he shall be entitled to be indemnified
by any person standing to him in the relation of a contractor from whom the
workman could have recovered compensation,] and all questions as to the
right to and the amount of any such indemnity shall, in default of agreement,
be settled by the Commissioner.
(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed as preventing a workman from
recovering compensation from the contractor instead of the principal.
(4) This section shall not apply in any case where the accident occurred
elsewhere that on, in or about the premises on which the principal has
undertaken or usually undertakes, as the case may be, to execute the work
or which are otherwise under his control or management. sdada
Liability to pay compensation
The principal employer cannot escape from his liability to pay compensation;
Surjeras Unkar jadhaw v. Gurinder Singh, (1991) 62 FLR 315 (Bom).
13. Remedies of employer against stranger.—Where a workman has
recovered compensation in respect of any injury caused under circumstances
creating a legal liability of some person other than the person by whom the
compensation was paid to pay damages in respect thereof, the person by
whom the compensation was paid and any person who has been called on to

1 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 9.
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

pay an indemnity under section 12 shall be entitled to be indemnified by the
person so liable to pay damages as aforesaid.
14. Insolvency of employer.—
(1) Where any employer has entered into a contract with any insurers in respect
of any liability under this Act to any workman, then in the event of the
employer becoming insolvent or making a composition or scheme of
arrangement with his creditors or, if the employer is a company, in the event
of the company having commenced to be wound up, the rights of the
employer against the insurers as respects that liability shall, notwithstanding
anything in any law for the time being in force relating to insolvency or the
winding up of companies, be transferred to and vest in the workman, and
upon any such transfer the insurers shall have the same rights and remedies
and be subject to the same liabilities as if they were the employer, so,
however, that the insurers shall not be under any greater liability to the
workman than they would have been under the employer.
(2) If the liability of the insurers to the workman is less than the liability of the
employer to the workman, the workman may prove for the balance in the
insolvency proceedings or liquidation.
(3) Where in any case such as is referred to in sub-section (1) the contract of the
employer with the insurers is void or voidable by reason of non-compliance
on the part of the employer with any terms or conditions of the contract (other
than a stipulation for the payment of premia), the provisions of that subsection
shall apply as if the contract were not void or voidable, and the
insurers shall be entitled to prove in the insolvency proceedings or liquidation
for the amount paid to the workman:
Provided that the provisions of this sub-section shall not apply in any case in
which the workman fails to give the notice to the insurers of the happening of
the accident and of any resulting disablement as soon as practicable after he
becomes aware of the institution of the insolvency or liquidation proceedings.
(4) There shall be deemed to be included among the debts which under section
49 of the Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909 (3 of 1909), or under
section 61 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (5 of 1920), or under

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
1[section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956)], are in the distribution
of the property of an insolvent or in the distribution of the assets of a
company being wound up to be paid in priority to all other debts, the amount
due in respect of any compensation the liability where for accrued before the
date of the order of adjudication of the insolvent or the date of the
commencement of the winding up, as the case may be, and those Acts shall
have effect accordingly..
(5) Where the compensation is a half-monthly payment, the amount due in
respect thereof shall, for the purposes of this section, be taken to be the
amount of the lump sum for which the half-monthly payment could, if
redeemable, be redeemed if applications were made for that purpose under
section 7, and a certificate of the Commissioner as to the amount of such
sum shall be conclusive proof thereof.
(6) The provisions of sub-section (4) shall apply in the case of any amount for
which an insurer is entitled to prove under sub-section (3), but otherwise
those provisions shall not apply where the insolvent or the company being
wound up has entered into such a contract with insurers as is referred to in
sub-section (1).
(7) This section shall not apply where a company is wound up voluntarily merely
for the purposes of reconstruction or of amalgamation with another company.
Section 14 does not operate as a prohibition against any proceeding
Section 14 does not operate as a prohibition against any proceedings before
the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioners invoking the insurer who is
liable under a contract of insurance to discharge the liability of the employer
to compensate the workmen, according to the provisions of the Workmen’s
Compensation Act. United India Insurance Co. v. Gangadharan Nair, (1987)
LLJ 448.
2[14A. Compensation to be first charge on assets transferred by
employer.—Where an employer transfers his assets before any amount due
in respect of any compensation, the liability wherefor accrued before the date

1 Subs, by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 7, for “section 230 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 (7 of
1913)” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
2 Ins. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 10 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

of the transfer, has been paid, such amount shall, notwithstanding anything
contained in any other law for the time being in force, be a first charge on that
part of the assets so transferred as qonsists of immovable property.]
15. Special provisions relating to masters and seamen.—This Act shall apply
in the case of workmen who are masters of 1[***] ships or seamen subject to
the following modifications, namely:—
(1) The notice of the accident and the claim for compensation may, except where
the person injured is the master of the ship, be served on the master of the
ship as if he were the employer, but where the accident happened and the
disablement commenced on board the ship, it shall not be necessary for any
seaman to give any notice of the accident.
(2) In the case of the death of a master or seaman, the claim for compensation
shall be made within 2[one year] after the news of the death has been
received by the claimant or, where the ship has been or is deemed to have
been lost with all hands, within eighteen months of the date on which the ship
was, or is deemed to have been, so lost:
3[Provided that the Commissioner may entertain any claim to compensation
in any case notwithstanding that the claim has not been preferred in due time
as provided in this sub-section, if he is satisfied that the failure so to prefer
the claim was due to sufficient cause.]
(3) Where an injured master or seaman is discharged or left behind in any part of
4[lndia or] 5[in any foreign country] any depositions taken by any Judge or
Magistrate in that part or by any Consular Officer in the foreign country and
transmitted by the person by whom they are taken to the Central Government
or any State Government shall, in any proceedings for enforcing the claim, be
admissible in evidence—
(a) if the deposition is authenticated by the signature of the Judge, Magistrate
or Consular Officer before whom it is made;
(b) if the defendant or the person accused, as the case may be, had an
opportunity by himself or his agent to cross-examine the witness; and

1 The word “registered” omitted by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 10.
2 Subs, by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 11 for “six months” (w.e.f- 1-6-1959).
3 Added by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 11 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
4 Ins. by the A.O. 1950.
5 Subs, by Act 22 of 1984, sec. 4, for “His Majesty’s dominions or in any other foreign country”
(w.e.f. 1-7-1984].

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(c) if the deposition was made in the course of a criminal proceeding, on
proof that the deposition was made in the presence of the person
accused, and it shall not be necessary in any case to prove the signature
or official character of the person appearing to have signed any such
deposition and a certificate by such person that the defendant or the
person accused had an opportunity of cross-examining the witness and
that the deposition if made in a criminal proceeding was made in the
presence of the person accused shall, unless the contrary is proved, be
sufficient evidence that he had that opportunity and that it was so made.
1[***]
2[(4)] No 3[half-monthly payment] shall be payable in respect of the period during
which the owner of the ship is, under any law in force for the time being 4[***J
relating to merchant shipping, liable to defray the expenses of maintenance of
the injured master or seaman.
5[(5) No compensation shall be payable under this Act in respect of any injury in
respect of which provision is made for payment of a gratuity, allowance or
pension under the War Pensions and Detention Allowances (Mercantile
Marine, etc.) Scheme, 1939, or the War Pensions and Detention Allowances
(Indian Seamen, etc.) Scheme, 1941, made under the Pensions (Navy, Army,
Air Force and Mercantile Marine) Act, 1939 (2 &3 Geo. 6, c. 83), or under the
War Pensions and Detention Allowances (Indian Seamen) Scheme, 1942,
made by the Central Government.
(6) Failure to give a notice or make a claim or commence proceedings within the
time required by this Act shall not be a bar to the maintenance of proceedings
under this Act in respect of any personal injury, if—
(a) an application has been made for payment in respect of that injury under
any of the schemes referred to in the preceding clause, and
(b) the State Government certifies that the said application was made in the
reasonable belief that the injury was one in respect of which the scheme
under which the application was made makes provision for payments,

1 Clause (4) omitted by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 7.
2 Clause (5) re-numbered as clause (4) by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 7.
3 Subs. by Act 7 of 1924, sec. 2 and Sch. I, for “monthly payment”.
4 The words and letters “in Part A States and Part C States” omitted by Act 3 of 1951, sec. 3 and
Sch.
5 Subs, by Act 1 of 1942, sec. 2, for clause (5) (w.e.f. 3-9-1939). Earlier clause (5) was inserted
by Act 42 of 1939, sec. 2.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

and that the application was rejected or that payments made in
pursuance of the application were discontinued on the ground that the
injury was not such an injury, and
(c) the proceedings under this Act are commenced within one month from the
date on which the said certificate of the State Government was furnished
to the person commencing the proceedings.]
1[15A. Special provisions relating to captains and other members of crew of
aircrafts.—This Act shall apply in the case of workmen who are captains or
other members of the crew of aircrafts subject to the following modifications,
namely:—
(1) The notice of the accident and the claim for compensation may, except where
the person injured is the captain of the aircraft, be served on the captain of
the aircraft and if he were the employer, but where the accident happened
and the disablement commenced on board the aircraft it shall not be
necessary for any member of the crew to give notice of the accident.
(2) In the case of the death of the captain or other member of the crew, the claim
for compensation shall be made within one year after the news of the death
has been received by the claimant or, where the aircraft has been or is
deemed to have been lost with, all hands, within eighteen months of the date
on which the aircraft was, or is deemed to have been, so lost:
Provided that the Commissioner may entertain any claim for compensation in
any case notwithstanding that the claim had not been preferred in due time
as provided in this sub-section, if he is satisfied that the failure so to prefer
the claim was due to sufficient cause.
(3) Where an injured captain or other member of the crew of the aircraft is
discharged or left behind in any part of India or in any other country any
depositions taken by any Judge or Magistrate in that part or by any Consular
Officer in the foreign country and transmitted by the person by whom they are
taken to the Central Government or any State Government shall in any
proceedings for enforcing the claim, be admissible in evidence—
(a) if the deposition is authenticated by the signature of the Judge, Magistrate
or Consular Officer before whom it is made;

1 Ins. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 8 (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(b) if the defendant or the person accused, as the case may be, had an
opportunity by himself or his agent to cross-examine the witness;
(c) if the deposition was made in the course of a criminal proceeding, on
proof, that the deposition was made in the presence of the person
accused, and it shall not be necessary in any case to prove the signature
or official character of the person appearing to have signed any such
deposition and a certificate by such person that the defendant or the
person accused had an opportunity of cross-examining the witness and
that the deposition if made in a criminal proceeding was made in the
presence of the person accused shall, unless the contrary is proved, be
sufficient evidence that he had that opportunity and that it was so made.]
1[15B. Special provisions relating to workmen abroad of companies and
motor vehicles.—This Act shall apply—
(i) in the cease of workmen who are persons recruited by companies registered
in India and working as such abroad, and
(ii) persons sent for work abroad along with motor vehicles registered under the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988) as drivers, helpers, mechanics,
cleaners or other workmen, subject to the following modifications, namely:—
(1) The notice of the accident and the claim for compensation may be served on
the local agent of the company, or the local agent of the owner of the motor
vehicle, in the country of accident, as the case may be.
(2) In the case of death of the workman in respect of whom the provisions of this
section shall apply, the claim for compensation shall be made within one year
after the news of the death has been received by the claimant:
Provided that the Commissioner may entertain any claim for compensation in
any case notwithstanding that the claim had not been preferred in due time
as provided in this sub-section, if he is satisfied that the failure so to prefer
the claim was due to sufficient cause.
(3) Where an injured workman is discharged or left behind in any part of India or
in any other country any depositions taken by any Judge or Magistrate in that
part or by any Consular Officer in the foreign country and transmitted by the
person by whom they are taken to the Central Government or any State

1 Ins. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 8 (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

Government shall, in any proceedings for enforcing the claims, be admissible
in evidence—
(a) if the deposition is authenticated by the signature of the Judge, Magistrate or
Consular Officer before whom it is made;
(b) if the defendant or the person accused, as the case may be, had an
opportunity by himself or his agent to cross-examine the witness;
(c) if the deposition was made in the course of a criminal proceeding, on proof
that the deposition was made in the presence of the person accused,
and it shall not be necessary in any case to prove the signature or official
character of the person appearing to have signed any such deposition and a
certificate by such person that the defendant or the person accused had an
opportunity of cross-examining the witness and that the deposition if made in
a criminal proceeding was made in the presence of the person accused shall,
unless the contrary is proved, be sufficient evidence that he had that
opportunity and that it was so made.]
16. Returns as to compensation.—The 1[State Government] may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, direct that every person employing
workmen, or that any specified class of such persons, shall send at such time
and in such form and to such authority, as may be specified in the
notification, a correct return specifying the number of injuries in respect of
which compensation has been paid by the employer during the previous year
and the amount of such compensation together with such other particulars as
to the compensation as the 2[State Government] may direct.
17. Contracting out.—Any contract or agreement whether made before or after
the commencement of this Act, whereby a workman relinquishes any right of
compensation from the employer for personal injury arising out of or in the
course of the employment, shall be null and void in so far as it purports to
remove or reduce the liability of any person to pay compensation under this
Act.

1 The words “G.G. in C.” have successively been substituted by the A.O. 1937 and the A.O.
1950 to read as above.
2 The words “G.G. in C.” have successively been substituted by the A.O. 1937 and the A.O.
1950 to read as above.
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
Interference by High Court
The interference of High Court with the order of recall on the ground of fraud
by workman by Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation unjustified both on
fact and law; Roshan Deen v. Preeti Lal, AIR 2002 SC 33.
Legislative mandate cannot be bypassed in exercise of supervisory and
extraordinary jurisdiction under article 227 of the Constitution The
Legislative mandate to protect rights of workman cannot be bypassed in exercise
of supervisory and extraordinary jurisdiction under article 227 of Constitution;
Roshan Deen v. Preeti Lal, (2002) 1 SCC 100.
18. Proof of age.—[Rep. by the Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act,
1959 (8 of 1959), section 12 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).]
1[18A. Penalties.—(1) Whoever—
(a) fails to maintain a notice-book which he is required to maintain under subsection
(3) of section 10, or
(b) fails to send to the Commissioner a statement which he is required to
send under sub-section (1) of section 10A, or
(c) fails to send a report which he is required to send under section 10B, or
(d) fails to make a return which he is required to make under section 16, shall
be punishable with fine which may extend to 2[five thousand] rupees.
(2) No prosecution under this section shall be instituted except by or with the
previous sanction of a Commissioner, and no court shall take cognizance of
any offence under this section, unless complaint thereof is made 3[within six
months of the date on which the alleged commission of the offence came to
the knowledge of the Commissioner].
CHAPTER III
COMMISSIONERS
19. Reference to Commissioners.—
(1) If any question arises in any proceedings under this Act as to the liability of
any person to pay compensation (including any question as to whether a
person injured is or is not a workman) or as to the amount or duration of

1 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 11.
2 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 9, for “five hundred” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
3 Subs. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 6, for certain words (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

compensation (including any question as to the nature or extent of
disablement), the question shall, in default of agreement, be settled by 1[a
Commissioner].
(2) No Civil Court shall have jurisdiction to settle, decide or deal with any
question which is by or under this Act required to be settled, decided or dealt
with by a Commissioner or to enforce any liability incurred under this Act.
Liability of the employer
The liability of the employer arises as soon as the injury is caused and at any
subsequent occasion. It cannot be suspended; State of Punjab v. Vidya Devi,
(1990) II LLN 579 (P&H).
Liability of the insurance company
If the insurance company has agreed to discharge the liability of the employer
under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the liability of the insurance company
to indemnify the insurer shall have to be determined by the Commissioner for
Workmen’s Compensation in the very same proceedings by virtue of the
provisions contained in section 19(1) of the Act; Razak Haji Jumma v. United
India Insurance Co., 1995 (I) LLJ 168 (Bom).
Scope of expression “any person”
The insurer also will come within the scope of “any person” contemplated in
section 19 of the Act and thus within the jurisdiction of the Workmen’s
Compensation Commissioner; New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Joseph, 2000 (I)
LLJ 1063 (Ker): (1999) 96 FJR 575.
Scope of sub-section (2)
The scope and scheme of sub-section (2) is not to take away from the civil
court its jurisdiction to give relief in tort, but to provide alternate optional remedy
for certain classes of persons in certain special circumstances and for certain
happenings. There are two requirements, which need to be satisfied by the
Commissioner to act under this Act— (1) the party must forego its right under the
common law of the land, (2) the facts giving jurisdiction to the Commissioner
must also exist side by side. When these two conditions are strictly fulfilled, the
Act seeks to bar jurisdiction of the civil court on the aspects, namely, settling,

1 Subs, by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 12, for “the Commissioner”.
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
deciding and dealing with any question involved in the proceeding; Gangnani &
Co. v. Saraswati, 2001 (11) LLJ 1022 (Bom): 2001 (II) CLR 842.
Section 19 does not take away the jurisdiction of the civil court
Section 19 of the Act does not take away the jurisdiction of the civil court to
grant relief in tort since section 5 indicates that the workman has an option to
claim compensation either under the Workmen’s Compensation Act or can take
recourse to the civil court for damages and the injuries sustained by him;
Minerals & Chemicals v. Thevan, 1991 (U) LLN 951 (Ker).
20. Appointment of Commissioners.—
(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint
any person to be a Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation for such
1[***] area as may be specified in the notification.
2[(2)Where more than one Commissioner has been appointed for any l[***] area,
the State Government may, by general or special order, regulate the
distribution of business between them.]
3[(3)] Any Commissioner may, for the purpose of deciding any matter referred to
him for decision under this Act, choose one or more persons possessing
special knowledge of any matter relevant to the matter under inquiry to assist
him in holding the inquiry.
4[(4)] Every Commissioner shall be deemed to be a public servant within the
meaning of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
21. Venue of proceedings and transfer.—
5[(1) Where any matter under this Act is to be done by or before a Commissioner,
the same shall, subject to the provisions of this Act and to any rules made
hereunder, be done by or before the Commissioner for the area in which—
(a) the accident took place which resulted in the injury; or
(b) the workman or in case of his death, the dependant claiming the
compensation ordinarily resides; or
(c) the employer has his registered office:

1 The word “local”omitted by Act 64 of 1962, sec.7 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
2 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 13.
3 Sub-sections (2) and (3) re-numbered as sub-sections (3) and (4) by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 13.
4 Sub-sections (2) and (3) re-numbered as sub-sections (3) and (4) by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 13.
5 Subs, by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 10, for sub-section (1) (w.e.f. 1-10-1996 vide S.O. 677[E], dated
25th September, 1996].

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

Provided that no matter shall be processed before or by a Commissioner,
other than the Commissioner having jurisdiction over the area in which the
accident took place, without his giving notice in the manner prescribed by the
Central Government to the Commissioner having jurisdiction over the area and
the Slate Government concerned:
Provided further that, where the workman, being the master of a ship or a
seaman or the captain or a member of the crew of an aircraft or a workman in a
motor vehicle or a company, meets with the accident outside India any such
matter may be done by or before a Commissioner for the area in which the owner
or agent of the ship, aircraft or motor vehicle resides or carries on business or the
registered office of the company is situate, as the case may be.
(1A) If a Commissioner, other than the Commissioner with whom any money has
been deposited under section 8, proceeds with a matter under this Act, the
former may for the proper disposal of the matter call for transfer of any
records or moneys remaining with the latter and on receipt of such a request,
he shall comply with the same.]
(2) If a Commissioner is satisfied 1[that any matter arising out of any
proceedings pending before him] can be more conveniently dealt with by any
other Commissioner, whether in the same State or not, he may, subject to
rules made under this Act, order such matter to be transferred to such other
Commissioner either for report or for disposal, and, if he does so, shall
forthwith transmit to such other Commissioner all documents relevant for the
decision of such matter and, where the matter is transferred for disposal,
shall also transmit in the prescribed manner any money remaining in his
hands or invested by him for the benefit of any party to the proceedings:
2[Provided that the Commissioner shall not, where any party to the
proceedings has appeared before him, make any order of transfer relating to
the distribution among dependants of a lump sum without giving such party
an opportunity of being heard:]
3[***]
(3) The Commissioner to whom any matter is so transferred shall, subject to
rules made under this Act, inquire thereinto and, if the matter was transferred

1 Subs, by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 9, for certain words.
2 Ins. by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 9.
3 Second proviso omitted by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 10 (w.e.f. 1-10-1996 vide S.O. 677(E), dated
25th September, 1996).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
for report, return his report thereon or, if the matter was transferred for
disposal, continue the proceedings as if they had originally commenced
before him.
(4) On receipt of a report from a Commissioner to whom any matter has been
transferred for report under sub-section (2), the Commissioner by whom it
was referred shall decide the matter referred in conformity with such report.
1[(5) The State Government may transfer any matter from any Commissioner
appointed by it to any other Commissioner appointed by it.]
22. Form of application.—
2[(1) Where an accident occurs in respect of which liability to pay compensation
under this Act arises, a claim for such compensation may, subject to the
provisions of this Act, be made before the Commissioner.
(1A) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (1), no application for the
settlement] of any matter by Commissioner 3[other than an application by a
dependant or dependants for compensation,] shall be made unless and until
some question has arisen between the parties in connection therewith which
they have been unable to settle by agreement.
(2) 4[An application to a Commissioner] may be made in such form and shall be
accompanied by such fee, if any, as may be prescribed, and shall contain, in
addition to any particulars which may be prescribed, the following particulars
namely:—
(a) a concise statement of the circumstances in which the application is
made and the relief or order which the applicant claims;
(b) in the case of a claim for compensation against an employer, the date of
service of notice of the accident on the employer, and if such notice has
not been served or has not been served in due time, the reason for such
omission;
(c) the names and addresses of the parties; and

1 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 14.
2 Subs, by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 11, for “(1) No application for the settlement” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
3 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 14.
4 Subs, by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 15, for “Where any such question has arisen, the application”.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

(d) 1[except in the case of an application by dependants for compensation] a
concise statement of the matters on which agreement has and 2[of] those
on which agreement has not been come to.
(3) If the applicant is illiterate or for any other reason is unable to furnish the
required information in writing, the application shall, if the applicant so
desires, be prepared under the direction of the Commissioner.
3[22A. Power of Commissioner to require further deposit in cases of fatal
accident.—
(1) Where any sum has been deposited by an employer as compensation
payable in respect of a workman whose injury has resulted in death, and in
the opinion of the Commissioner such sum is insufficient, the Commissioner
may, by notice in writing stating his reasons, call upon the employer to show
cause why he should not make a further deposit within such time as may be
stated in the notice.
(2) If the employer fails to show cause to the satisfaction of the Commissioner,
the Commissioner may make an award determining the total amount payable,
and requiring the employer to deposit the deficiency.]
23. Powers and procedure of Commissioners.—The Commissioner shall have
all the powers of a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of
1908), for the purpose of taking evidence on oath (which such Commissioner
is hereby empowered to impose) and of enforcing the attendance of
witnesses and compelling the production of documents and material objects,
4[and the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for all the
purposes of 5[section 195 and of Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)]].
Award of compensation by Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner

1 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 15.
2 Subs, by Act 37 of 1925, sec. 2 and Sch. I, for “on”.
3 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 16.
4 Added by Act 5 of 1929, sec. 5.
5 Subs, by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 12, for “section 195 and of Chapter XXXV of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1890)” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
It is within the competence of the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner
and he is also bound to award compensation as prescribed under Schedule 4
read with sec. 4 (1) (a) of the Act even if heirs of deceased workman claim less
compensation than prescribed under the Act and the Schedule; Mostt,, Chhatiya
Devi Gowalin v. Rup Lal Sao, 1978 Lab 1C 1368: 1978 BLR 502; 1978 ACJ 481;
1978 BJR 622.
Principle of waive or acquiescence
Even if the claimant has made a claim of lesser amount than due, his right to
claim or the power of the Commissioner to enhance the compensation is neither
waived nor curtailed since the principle of waive or acquiscence has no
application to such type of cases; Balavandra Patra v. Chief Engineer Orissa,
1987 (I) LLN 634; Mohd. Koya v. Balan, 1987 (I) LLN 353.
Refusal by Commissioner to record memorandum of agreement
Where it appears to the Commissioner that an agreement as to the payment
of lump sum whether by way of redemption of a half-monthly payment or
otherwise, or an agreement as to the amount of compensation to a workman or a
person under a legal disability ought not to be registered because of inadequacy
of the sum or amount or by reason of the agreement having been obtained by
fraud or undue influence or other improper means, the Commissioner may refuse
to record the memorandum of the agreement. He may pass such order including
an order as to any sum already paid under the agreement, as he thinks just in the
circumstances; Amarshi jeram v. M/s. Hazarat and Co., AIR 1962 Guj 262: 1962
II LL] 187.
1[24. Appearance of parties.—Any appearance, application or act required to be
made or done by any person before or to a Commissioner (other than an
appearance of a party which is required for the purpose of his examination as
a witness) may be made or done on behalf of such person by a legal
practitioner or by an official of an Insurance Company or a registered Trade
Union or by an Inspector appointed under sub-section (1) of section 8 of the
Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948), or under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the
Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), or by any other officer specified by the State
Government in this behalf, authorised in writing by such person, or with the
permission of the Commissioner, by any other person so authorised.]

1 Subs. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 14, for section 24 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

25. Method of recording evidence.—The Commissioner shall make a brief
memorandum of the substance of the evidence of every witness as the
examination of the witness proceeds, and such memorandum shall be written
and signed by the Commissioner with his own hand and shall form part of the
record:
Provided that, if the Commissioner is prevented from making such
memorandum, he shall record the reason of his inability to do so and shall
cause such memorandum to be made in writing from his dictation and shall
sign the same, and such memorandum shall form part of the record:
Provided further that the evidence of any medical witness shall be taken
down as nearly as may be word for word.
26. Costs.—All costs, incidental to any proceedings before a Commissioner
shall, subject to rules made under this Act, be in the discretion of the
Commissioner.
27. Power to submit cases.—A Commissioner may, if he thinks fit, submit any
question of law for the decision of the High Court and, if he does so, shall
decide the question in conformity with such decision.
28. Registration of agreements.—(1) Where the amount of any lamp sum
payable as compensation has been settled by agreement whether by way of
redemption of a half-monthly payment or otherwise, or where any
compensation has been so settled as being payable 1[to a woman, or a
person under a legal disability] 2[***J a memorandum thereof shall be sent by
the employer to the Commissioner, who shall, on being satisfied as to its
genuineness, record the memorandum in a register in the prescribed manner:
Provided that—
(a) no such memorandum shall be recorded before seven days after
communication by the Commissioner of notice to the parties concerned;
3[***]
(c) the Commissioner may at any rime rectify the register;

1 Subs. by Act 5 of 1929, sec. 6, for “to a person under a legal disability”.
2 The words “or to a dependant”, rep. by Act 7 of 1924, sec. 3 and Sch. II.
3 Clause (b) omitted by Act 5 of 1929, sec. 6.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(d) where it appears to the Commissioner that an agreement as to the
payment of a lump sum whether by way of redemption of a half-monthly
payment or otherwise, or an agreement as to the amount of
compensation payable, 1[to a woman or a person under a legal disability]
1[***] ought not to be registered by reason of the inadequacy of the sum or
amount, or by reason of the agreement having been obtained by fraud or
undue influence or other improper means, he may refuse to record the
memorandum of the agreement 2[and may make such order], including an
order as to any sum already paid under the agreement, as he thinks just
in the circumstances.
(2) An agreement for the payment of compensation which has been registered
under sub-section (1) shall be enforceable under this Act notwithstanding
anything contained in the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), or in any
other law for the time being in force.
Receipt of payment of compensation has to be registered
Section 28 mandates that a receipt of payment of compensation has to be
registered; Naggapattinam Import and Export Corporation v, K. Lakshmi, (1992)
65 FLR 928 (Mad).
29. Effect of failure to register agreement.—Where a memorandum of any
agreement the registration of which is required by section 28, is not sent to
the Commissioner as required by that section, the employer shall be liable to
pay the full amount of compensation which he is liable to pay under the
provisions of this Act, and notwithstanding anything contained in the proviso
to sub-section (1) of section 4, shall not, unless the Commissioner otherwise
directs, be entitled to deduct more than half of any amount paid to the
workman by way of compensation whether under the agreement or
otherwise.
30. Appeals.—

1 The words “or to any dependant”, rep. by Act 7 of 1924, sec, 3 and Sch. II.
2 Subs. by Act 7 of 1924, sec. 2 and Sch. 1, for “or may make such order”.
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

(1) An appeal shall lie to the High Court from the following orders of a
Commissioner, namely:—
(a) an order as awarding as compensation a lump sum whether by way of
redemption of a half-monthly payment or otherwise or disallowing a claim in
full or in part for a lump sum;
1[(aa) an order awarding interest or penalty under section 4A;]
(b) an order refusing to allow redemption of a half-monthly payment;
(c) an order providing for the distribution of compensation among the dependants
of a deceased workman, or disallowing any claim of a person alleging himself
to be such dependant;
(d) an order allowing or disallowing any claim for the amount of an indemnity
under the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 12; or
(e) an order refusing to register a memorandum of agreement or registering the
same or providing for the registration of the same subject to conditions:
Provided that no appeal shall lie against any order unless a substantial
question of law is involved in the appeal, and in the case of an order other
than an order such as is referred to in clause (b), unless the amount in
dispute in the appeal is not less than three hundred rupees:
Provided further that no appeal shall lie in any case in which the parties have
agreed to abide by the decision of the Commissioner, or in which the order of
the Commissioner gives effect to an agreement come to by the parties:
2[Provided further that no appeal by an employer under clause (a) shall lie
unless the memorandum of appeal is accompanied by a certificate by the
Commissioner to the effect that the appellant has deposited with him the
amount payable under the order appealed against.]
(2) The period of limitation for an appeal under this section shall be sixty days.
(3) The provisions of section 5 of 3[the Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963)1, shall
be applicable to appeals under this section.
Interference by High Court
In appeal under section 30, the High Court can interfere, if a party is able to
prove that the findings are perverse in the sense that either of the findings are

1 Ins. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 15 (w.e.f 1-6-1959).
2 Added by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 17
3 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 13, for “the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908)” (w.e.f. 15-9-
1995).
Case Law

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
without any material on record or it is totally opposed to the material on record;
T.S. Prubhu v. Bhavani Poojary, 2003 LLR 162 (Kant HC) 2003 LR 26.
Jurisdiction to entertain an appeal
The appellate court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal unless the same
involves a substantial question of law; Nisan Springs (Pvt.) Ltd v. Om Jain, 1990
LLR 93 (MP).
Substantial question of law
(i) The mere difficulty of applying the facts to the law will not amount to a
substantial question of law; Asmath Bedi (dead) v. Marlmuthu, 1990 LLR 450
(Mad).
(ii) An appeal against the order of the Compensation Commissioner lies only
when a substantial question of law is involved; Mangala Ben v. Dalip
Motwani, 1998 LLR 656.
(iii) Scope of section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for entertaining the
appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner is very limited. The
said section 30 very clearly provides that the award of the Commissioner
passed under the aforesaid Act can be challenged in the appeal where
substantial question of law are involved; General Manager, C.C. Ltd. v. Bhim
Yadav, 2003 LLR 574 (Jhk HC).
1[30A. Withholding of certain payments pending decision of appeal.—
Where an employer makes an appeal under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of
section 30, the Commissioner may, and if so directed by the High Court shall,
pending the decision of the appeal, withhold payment of any sum in deposit
with him.]
31. Recovery.—The Commissioner may recover as an arrear of land-revenue
any amount payable by any person under this Act, whether under an
agreement for the payment of compensation or otherwise, and the
Commissioner shall be deemed to be a public officer within the meaning of
section 5 of the Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 (1 of 1890).
CHAPTER IV
RULES
32. Power of the 1[State Government] to make rules.—

1 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 18.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

(1) The 2[State Government] may make rules to carry out the purposes of this
Act.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power,
such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters namely:—
(a) for prescribing the intervals at which and the conditions subject to which
an application for review may be made under section 6 when not
accompanied by a medical certificate;
(b) for prescribing the intervals at which and the conditions subject to which a
workman may be required to submit himself for medical examination
under sub-section (1) of section 11;
(c) for prescribing the procedure to be followed by Commissioners in the
disposal of cases under this Act and by the parties in such cases;
(d) for regulating the transfer of matters and cases from one Commissioner to
another and the transfer of money in such cases;
(e) for prescribing the manner in which money in the hands of a
Commissioner may be invested for the benefit of dependants of a
deceased workman and for the transfer of money so invested from one
Commissioner to another;
(f) for the representation in proceedings before Commissioners of parties who
are minors or are unable to make an appearance;
(g) for prescribing the form and manner in which memoranda of agreements
shall be presented and registered;
(h) for the withholding by Commissioners, whether in whole or in part of halfmonthly
payments pending decision on applications for review of the
same; 3[***].
4[***]
5[(i) for regulating the scales of costs which may be allowed in proceedings
under this Act;
(j) for prescribing and determining the amount of the fees payable in respect
of any proceedings before a Commissioner under this Act;

1 The words “G.G. in C.” successively substituted by the A.O. 1937 and the A.O. 1950 to read as
above.
2 The word “and” omitted by the A.O. 1937.
3 The word “and” omitted by the A.O. 1937.
4 Clause (i) omitted by A.O. 1937.
5 Clauses (a) to (f) of section 33 after being re-lettered as clauses (i) to (n) respectively were
added to sec. 32 by A.O. 1937.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(k) for the maintenance by Commissioners of registers and records of
proceedings before them;
(l) for prescribing the classes of employers who shall maintain notice-books
under sub-section (3) of section 10, and the form of such notice-books;
(m) for prescribing the form of statement to be submitted by employers under
section 10 A; 1[***]
(n) for prescribing the cases in which the report referred to in section 10B
may be sent to an authority other than the Commissioner;]
2[(o) for prescribing abstracts of this Act and requiring the employers to
display notices containing such abstracts;
(p) for prescribing the manner in which diseases specified as occupational
diseases may be diagnosed;
(q) for prescribing the manner in which diseases may be certified for any of
the purposes of this Act;
(r) for prescribing the manner in which, and the standards by which,
incapacity may be assessed.]
3[(3) Every rule made under this section shall be laid, as soon as may be after it
is made, before the State Legislature.]
33. Power of Local Government to make rules.—[Rep. by the A.O. 2937.]
34. Publication of rules.—
(1) The power to make rules conferred by 4[section 32] shall be subject to the
condition of the rules being made after previous publication.
(2) The date to be specified in accordance with clause (3) of section 23 of the
General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897) as that after which a draft of rules
proposed to be made under section 32 5[***] will be taken into consideration,
shall not be less than three months from the date on which the draft of the
proposed rules was published for general information.

1 The word “and” ins. by A.O. 1937 and omitted by Act 58 of 1960, sec. 3 and Sch- II.
2 Ins. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 16 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
3 Ins. by Act 4 of 1986, sec. 2 and Sch. II (w.e.f. 15-5-1986).
4 Subs, by the A.O. 1937, for “sections 32 and 33”.
5 The words and figures “or section 33” omitted by the A.O. of 1937.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

(3) Rules so made shall be published in 1[***] the Official Gazette 2[***], and on
such publication, shall have effect as if enacted in this Act.
3[35. Rules to give effect to arrangements with other countries for the
transfer of money paid as compensation.—
4[(1)] The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make
rules for the transfer 5[***] 6[to any foreign country] of money 7[deposited with]
with] a Commissioner under this Act 8[which has been awarded to or may be
due to], any person residing or about to reside in 9[10 [such foreign country]]
and for the receipt 11[distribution ] and administration in 12[any State] of any
money 13[deposited] under the law relating to workmen’s compensation 14[***]
15[**] 8[in any foreign country,] 16[which has been awarded to, or may be due
to] any person residing or about to reside in 17[any State]:]
18[Provided that no sum deposited under this Act in respect of fatal accidents
shall be so transferred without the consent of the employer concerned under
the Commissioner receiving the sum has passed orders determining its
distribution and apportionment under the provisions of sub-sections (4) and
(5) of section 8.
(2) Where money deposited with a Commissioner has been so transferred in
accordance with the rules made under this section, the provisions elsewhere
contained in this Act regarding distribution by the Commissioner of

1 The words “the Gazette of India or” omitted by the A.O. of 1937.
2 The words “as the case may be” omitted by the A.O. of 1937.
3 Ins. by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 20.
4 Section 35 re-numbered as sub-section (1) of that section by Act 7 of 1937, sec. 2.
5 The words and letter “to any Part B State or” omitted by Act 3 of 1951, sec. 3 and Sch.
6 Subs. by Act 22 of 1984, sec. 5, for certain words (w.e.f. 1-7-1984).
7 Subs. by Act 7 of 1937, sec. 2, for “paid to”.
8 Subs. by Act 7 of 1937, sec. 2, for “for the benefit of”.
9 Subs. by Act 3 of 1951, sec. 3, and Sch., for “such State, part or country”.
10 Subs. by Act 22 of 1984, sec. 5, for “such part or country” (w.e.f. 1-7-1984).
11 Ins. by Act 7 of 1937, sec. 2.
12 Subs. by Act 3 of 1951, sec. 3, and Sch., for “a Part A State or Part C State”.
13 Subs. by Act 7 of 1937, sec. 2, for “awarded”.
14 The words and letter “in any Part B State” omitted by Act 3 of 1951, sec. 3 and Sch.
15 The word “or” omitted by Act 36 of 1957, sec. 3 and Sch. II.
16 Subs. by Act 7 of 1937, sec. 2, for “and applicable for the benefit of”.
17 Subs. by Act 3 of 1951, sec. 3, and Sch., for “a Part A State or Part C State”.
18 Added by Act 7 of 1937, sec. 2.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
compensation deposited with him shall cease to apply in respect of any such
money.]
1[36. Rules made by Central Government to be laid before Parliament.—
Every rule made under this Act by the Central Government shall be laid as
soon as may be after it is made before each House of Parliament while it is in
session for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one
session or in 2[two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of
the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions
aforesaid] both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both
Houses agree that fhe rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have
effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so
however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice
to the validity of anything previously done under that rule]

1 Ins, by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 8 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
2 Subs, by Act 65 of 1976, sec. 3, for certain words (w.e.f. 21-5-1976).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

1[SCHEDULE I
[See sections 2(1) and 4)]
2[PART I
LIST OF INJURIES DEEMED TO RESULT IN PERMANENT TOTAL
DISABLEMENT]
S.No. Description of Injury Percentage of loss of earning
capacity
1. Loss of both hands or amputation at higher sites
100
2. Loss of a hand and a foot
100
3. Double amputation through leg or thigh, or amputation
through leg or thigh on one side and loss of other foot
100
4. Loss of sight to such an extent as to render the claimant
unable to perform any work for which eye-sight is essential. 100
5. Very severe facial disfigurement
100
6. Absolute deafness
100
3[PART II
LIST OF INJURIES DEEMED TO RESULT IN PERMANENT PARTIAL
DISABLEMENT]
S.No. Description of Injury Percentage of loss of earning
capacity
Amputation cases—upper limbs (either arm)
4[1] Amputation through shoulder joint 90
5[2] Amputation below shoulder with stump less than 6[20.32 Cms.]
from tip of acromion 80
1[3] Amputation form 2[20.32 Cms.] from tip of acromion to less than

1 Subs. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 17, for the Schedule (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
2 Subs. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9, for the heading “LIST OF INJURIES DEEMED TO RESULT
IN PERMANENT PARTIAL DISABLEMENT” {w.e.f 1-2-1963).
3 Ins. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
4 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
5 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
6 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec, 14, for “3½” “ (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
3[11.43 Cms.] below tip of olecranon 70
4[4] Loss of a hand or of the thumb and four fingers of one hand or
amputation from 5[11.43 Cms.] below tip of colcannon 60
6[5] Loss of thumb 30
S.No. Description of Injury Percentage of loss of earning
capacity
7[6] Loss of thumb and its metacarpal bone 40
8[7] Loss of four fingers of one hand 50
9[8] Loss of three fingers of one hand 30
10[9] Loss of two fingers of one hand 20
11[10] Loss of terminal phalanx of thumb 20
12[10 A Guillotine amputation of tip of thumb without loss of bone 10]
Amputation cases—lower limbs
13[11] Amputation of both feet resulting in end bearing stumps. 90
14[12] Amputation through both feet proximal to the
metatarso phalangeal joint 80
15[13] Loss of all toes of both feet through the metatarso-phalangeal joint 40
16[14] Loss of all toes of both feet proximal to the proximal interphalangeal
joint 30
17[15] Loss of all toes of both feet distal to the proximal inter-phalangeal
joint 20
18[16] Amputation at hip ... . . . . . 90

1 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
2 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 14, for “8” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
3 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 14, for “4¼” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
4 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
5 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 14, for “4¼” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
6 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
7 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
8 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
9 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
10 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
11 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
12 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 14, for “4¼” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
13 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as I to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
14 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as I to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
15 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as I to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
16 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as I to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
17 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as I to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
18 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as I to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

1[17] Amputation below hip with stump not exceeding 2[12.70 Cms.]
in length measured from tip of great trenchanter . . . 80
3[18] Amputation below hip with stump exceeding 4[12.70 Cms.] in length measured from tip S.No. Description of Injury Percentage of loss of earning
capacity
5[19] Amputation below middle thigh to 6[8.89 Cms.] below knee. 60
7[20] Amputation below knee with stump exceeding 8[8.89 Cms.]
but not exceeding 9[12.70 Cms.] 50
10[21] Amputation below knee with stump exceeding 11[12.70 Cms] 12[50]
13[22] Amputation of one foot resulting in end bearing 14[50]
15[23] Amputation through one foot proximal to the metatarsophalangeal
joint 16[50]
17[24] Loss of all toes of one foot through the metatarso-phalangeal joint 20
Other injuries
18[25] Loss of one eye, without complications, the other being normal 40
19[26] Loss of vision of one eye, without complications or disfigurement of
eye
ball, the other being normal 30
20[26A Loss of partial vision of one eye 10]


16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

1[41] Through metatarso-phalangeal joint 3
2 [42] Part, with some loss of bone 1
Two toes of one foot, excluding great toe
3 [43] Through metatarso-phalangeal joint
4 [44] Part, with some loss of bone 2
Three toes of one foot, excluding great toe
5 [45] Through metatarso-phalangeal joint 6
6 [46] Part, with some loss of bone 3
Four toes of one foot, excluding great toe
7 [47] Through metatarso-phalangeal joint 9
8 [48] Part-with some loss of bone 3]
9[Note.—Complete and permanent loss of the use of any limb or member
referred to in the Schedule shall be deemed to be the equivalent of the loss of
that limb or member.]
SCHEDULE II
[See section 2(1) (n)]
LIST OF PERSONS WHO, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2
(1) (n), ARE INCLUDED IN THE
DEFINITION OF WORKMEN
The following persons are workmen within the meaning of section 2 (1) (n)
and subject to the provisions of that section, that is to say, any person who is—
10[11[(i) employed, otherwise than in a clerical capacity or on a railway, in
connection with the operation 12[ repair] or maintenance of a lift or a vehicle
propelled by steam or other mechanical power or by electricity or in
connection with the loading or unloading of any such vehicle; or

1 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 {w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
2 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 {w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
3 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 {w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
4 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 {w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
5 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 {w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
6 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 {w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
7 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 {w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
8 Entries 7 to 54 re-numbered as 1 to 48 by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 9 {w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
9 Added by Act 58 of 1960, sec. 3 and Sch. II (w.e.f. 26-12-1960).
10 Subs, by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 21, clauses (i) to (xiii).
11 Subs, by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 18, for clauses (i) to (ix) (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
12 Ins. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 15 (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(ii) employed, otherwise than in a clerical capacity, in any premises wherein or
within the precincts whereof a manufacturing process as defined in clause (k)
of section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948), is being carried on, or in
any kind of work whatsoever incidental to or connected with any such
manufacturing process or with the article made, 1[whether or not employment
employment in any such work is within such premises or precincts] and
steam, water or other mechanical power or electrical power is used; or
(iii) employed for the purpose of making, altering, repairing, ornamenting,
finishing or otherwise adapting for use, transport or sale any article or part of
an article in any premises wherein or within the precincts whereof twenty or
more persons are so employed; 2[***]
3[Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause, persons employed outside such
such premises or precincts but in any work incidental to, or connected, with, the
work relating to making, altering, repairing, ornamenting, finishing or otherwise
adapting for use, transport or sale of any article or part of an article shall be
deemed to be employed within such premises or precincts; or]
(iv) employed in the manufacture or handling of explosives in connection with the
employer’s trade or business; or
(v) employed, in any mine as defined in clause (j) of section 2 of the Mines Act,
1952 (35 of 1952), in any mining operation or in any kind of work other than
clerical work, incidental to or connected with any mining operation or with the
mineral obtained, or in any kind of work whatsoever below ground; or
(vi) employed as the master or as a seaman of—
(a) any ship which is propelled wholly or in part by steam or other mechanical
power or by electricity or which is towed or intended to be towed by a ship
so propelled; or
(b) any ship not included in sub-clause (a), of twenty-five tons net tonnage or
over; or
(c) any sea going ship not included in sub-clause (a) or sub-clause (b)
provided with sufficient area for navigation under sails alone; or
(vii) employed for the purpose of —
(a) loading, unloading, fuelling, constructing, repairing, demolishing, cleaning
or painting any ship of which he is not the master or a member of the

1 Ins. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 10 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
2 The word “or” omitted by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 10 (w.e.f, 1-2-1963).
3 Ins. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 10 (w.e.f 1-2-1963).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

crew, or handling or transport within the limits of any port subject to 1[the
Ports Act, 1908 (15 of 1908), or the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (38 of
1963)], of goods which have been discharged from or are to be loaded
into any vessel; or
(b) warping a ship through the lock; or
(c) mooring and unmooring ships at harbour wall berths or in pier; or
(d) removing or replacing dry dock caisoons when vessels are entering or
leaving dry docks; or
(e) the docking or undocking of any vessel during an emergency; or
(f) preparing splicing coir springs and check wires, painting depth marks on
locksides, removing or replacing fenders whenever necessary, landing of
gangways, maintaining lifebuoys up to standard or any other maintenance
work of a like nature; or
(g) any work on jolly-boats for bringing a ships line to the wharf; or
(viii) employed in the construction, maintenance, repair or demolition of —
(a) any building which is designed to be or is or has been more than one
storey in height above the ground or twelve feet or more from the ground
level to the apex of the roof; or
(b) any dam or embankment which is twelve feet or more in height from its
lowest to its highest point; or
(c) any road, bridge, tunnel or canal; or
(d) any wharf, quay, sea wall or other marine work including any moorings of
ships; or
(ix) employed in setting up, maintaining repairing or taking down any telegraph or
telephone line or post or any overhead electric line or cable or standard or
fittings and fixtures for the same; or]
(x) employed, otherwise than in a clerical capacity, in the construction, working,
repair or demolition of any aerial ropeway, canal, pipeline or sewer; or
(xi) employed in the service of any fire brigade; or
(xii)employed upon a railway as defined in 2[clause (31) of section 2 and
sub-section (1) of section 197 of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989)], either
directly or through a sub-contractor, by a person fulfilling a contract with the
railway administration; or

1 Subs, by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 15, for “The Indian Ports Act, 190S (15 of 1908)” (w.e.f. 15-9-
1995).
2 Subs, by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 15, for certain words (w.e.f. 15-9-1995),

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(xiii) employed as an inspector, mail guard, sorter or van peon in the Railway
Mail Service 1[or as a telegraphist or as a postal or railway signaler], or
employed in any occupation ordinarily involving outdoor work in the Indian
Posts and Telegraphs Department; or]
(xiv)employed, otherwise than in a clerical capacity, in connection with operation
for winning natural petroleum or natural gas; or
(xv) employed in any occupation involving blasting operations; or
(xvi)employed in the making of any excavation in which on any one day of the
preceding twelve months more than 2[twenty-five] persons have been
employed or explosives have been used, or whose depth from its highest to
its lowest point exceeds 3[twelve] feet; or
(xvii)employed in the operation of any ferry boat capable of carrying more than
ten persons; or
(xviii) employed, otherwise than in a clerical capacity, on any estate which is
maintained for the purpose of growing 4[cardamom], cinchona, coffee, rubber
or tea, and on which on any one day in the preceding twelve months twentyfive
or more persons have been so employed; or
5[(xix) employed, otherwise than in a clerical capacity, in the generating,
transforming transmitting or distribution of electrical energy or in generation or
supply of gas; or]
(xx) employed in a lighthouse as defined in clause (d) of section 2 of the
Indian Lighthouse, Act 1927 (17 of 1927); or
(xxi)employed in producing cinematograph pictures intended for public exhibition
or in exhibiting such pictures; or
(xxii) employed in the training, keeping or working of elephants or wild animals;
or
6[(xxiii) employed in the tapping of palm-trees or the felling or logging of trees, or
the transport of timber by inland waters, or the control or extinguishing of
forests fires; or]
(xxiv) employed in operations for the catching or hunting of elephants or other
wild animals; or

1 Ins. by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 18 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
2 Subs, by Act 8 of 1959, sec. 18, for “fifty” (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
3 Subs, by Act S of 1959, sec. 18, for “twenty” (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
4 Ins. by Act 64 of 1962, sec. 10 (w.e.f. 1-2-1963).
5 Subs, by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 15, for item (xix) (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
6 Ins. by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 11.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

1[(xxv)] employed as a diver; 2[or]
(xxvi) employed in the handling or transport of goods in, or within the precincts
of,—
(a) any warehouse or other place in which goods are stored, and in which on
any one day of the preceding twelve months ten or more persons have
been so employed or,
(b) any market in which on any one day of the preceding twelve months 3[fifty]
or more person have been so employed; or
(xxvii) employed in any occupation involving the handling and manipulation of
radium or X-rays apparatus, or contact with radioactive substances;] 4[or]
(xxviii) employed in or in connection with the construction, erection, dismantling,
operation or maintenance of an aircraft as defined in section 2 of the
Indian Aircraft Act, 1934 (22 of 1934); or
(xxix) 5[employed in horticultural operations, forestry, bee-keeping or farming]
by tractors or other contrivances driven by steam or other mechanical
power or by electricity; or
(xxx) employed, otherwise than in a clerical capacity, in the construction,
working, repair or maintenance of a tube-well; or
(xxxi) employed in the maintenance, repair or renewal of electric fittings in a
building; or
(xxxii) employed in a circus.
6[(xxxiii) employed as watchman in any factory or establishment; or
(xxxiv) employed in any operation in the sea for catching fish; or
(xxxv) employed in any employment which requires handling of snakes for the
purpose of extraction of venom or for the purpose of looking after snakes
or handling any other poisonous animal or insect; or
(xxxvi) employed in handling animals like horses, mules and bulls; or
(xxxvii) employed for the purpose of loading or unloading any mechanically
propelled vehicle or in the handling or transport of goods which have
been loaded in such vehicles; or

1 Subs, by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 15, for item (xix) (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
2 Ins. by Act 9 of 1938, sec. 11.
3 Subs. by Act 8 of 1959 sec. 18, for “one hundred” (w.e.f. l-h-1959).
4 Ins. by Act 8 of 1959 sec. 18 (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).
5 Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 15, for “employed in farming” (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).
6 Inst. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 15, (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
(xxxviii) employed in cleaning of sewer lines or septic tanks within the limits of a
local authority; or
(xxxix) employed on surveys and investigation, exploration or gauge or discharge
observation of rivers including drilling operations, hydrological
observations and flood forecasting activities, ground water surveys and
exploration; or
(xl) employed in cleaning of jungles or reclaiming land or ponds in which on
any one day of the preceding twelve months more than twenty-five
persons have been employed; or
(xli) employed in cultivation of land or rearing and maintenance of live-stock or
forest operations or fishing in which on any one day of the preceding
twelve months more than twenty-five persons have been employed; or
(xlii) employed in installation, maintenance or repair of pumping equipment
used for lifting of water from wells, tube-wells, ponds, lakes, streams and
the like; or
(xliii) employed in the construction, boring or deepening of an open well or dug
well, bore well, bore-cum-dug well, filter point and the like; or
(xliv) employed in spraying and dusting of insecticides or pesticides in
agricultural operations or plantations; or
(xlv) employed in mechanised harvesting and threshing operations; or
(xlvi) employed in working or repair or maintenance of bulldozers, tractors,
power tillers and the like; or
(xlvii) employed as artist for drawing pictures on advertisement boards at a
height of 3.66 metres or more from the ground level; or
(xlviii) employed in any newspaper establishment as defined in the Working
Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and
Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 and engaged in outdoor work;]
1[(xlix) employed as divers for work under water.]
Explanation.—In this Schedule, “the preceding twelve months” relates in any
particular case to the twelve months ending with the day on which the accident in
such case occurred.]

1 Ins. by G.S.R. 381, dated 3rd November, 1997, published in the Gazette of India, Pt. II, Sec. 3
(i), dated 15th Novembet, 1997.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

SCHEDULE III
(See section 3)
LIST OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
S.
No.
Occupational disease Employment
(1) (2) (3)
PART A
1. Infectious and parasitic diseases
contracted in an occupation where
there is a particular risk of
contamination.
(a) All work involving exposure to
health or laboratory work;
(b) All work involving exposure to
veterinary work;
(c) Work relating to handling
animals, animal carcasses, part of
such carcasses or merchandise
which may have been
contaminated by animals or animal
carcasses;
(d) Other work carrying a particular
risk of contamination.
2. Diseases caused by work in
compressed air.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
3. Diseases caused by lead or its
toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
4. Poisoning by nitrous fumes. All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
5. Poisoning by organo phosphorus
compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
PART B
1. Diseases caused by phosphorus or
its toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
2. Diseases caused by mercury or its
toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
3. Diseases caused by benzene or its All work involving exposure to the

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
toxic homologues. risk concerned.
4. Diseases caused by nitro and
amido toxic derivatives of benzene
or its homologues.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
5. Diseases caused by chromium, or
its toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
6. Diseases caused by arsenic, or its
toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
7. Diseases caused by radioactive
substances and ionising radiations.
All work involving exposure to the
action of radioactive substances or
ionising radiations.
8. Primary epitheliomatous cancer of
the skin, caused by tar, pitch,
bitumen, mineral oil, anthracene, or
the compounds, products or
residues of these substances.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
9. Diseases caused by the toxic
halogen derivatives of
hydrocarbons (of the aliphatic and
aromatic series).
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
10. Diseases caused by carbon
disulphide.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
11. Occupational cataract due to
infrared radiations.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
12. Diseases caused by manganese or
its toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
13. Skin diseases caused by physical,
chemical or biological agents not
included in other items.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned,
14. Hearing impairment caused by
noise.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
15. Poisoning by di-nitrophenol or a
homologue or by substituted di-
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned,

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964

nitrophenol or by the salts of such
substances.
16. Diseases caused by beryllium or its
toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
17. Diseases caused by cadmium or its
toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
18. Occupational asthma caused by
recognised sensitizing agents
inherent to the work process,
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
19. Diseases caused by fluorine or its
toxic compounds.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
20. Diseases caused by nitroglycerin,
or other nitroacid esters.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
21. Diseases caused by alcohols and
ketones.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
22. Diseases caused by asphyxiants,
carbon monoxide, and its toxic
derivatives, hydrogen sulphide.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
23. Lung cancer and mesotheliomas
caused by asbestos.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
24. Primary neoplasm of the epithelial
lining of the urinary bladder or the
kidney or the ureter.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
1[25. Snow blindness in snow bound
areas.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
26. Disease due to effect of heat in
extreme hot climate.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
27. Disease due to effect of cold in
extreme cold climate.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.]
PART C
1. Pneumoconiosis caused by All work involving exposure to the

1 Ins. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 16 (w.e.f. 15-9-1995).

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964
sclerogenic mineral dust (silicoses,
anthraoo-silicosis, asbestosis) and
silico tuberculosis provided that
silicon is an essential factor in
causing the resultant incapacity or
death.
risk concerned.
2. Bagassosis All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
3. Bronchopul mo nary diseases
caused by cotton, flax hemp and
sisal dust (Byssionsis),
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
4. Extrinsic allergic alveelitis caused
by inhalation of organic dusts.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.
5. Bronchopulmonary diseases
caused by hard metals.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.]
1[6. Acute Pulmonary oedema of high
altitude.
All work involving exposure to the
risk concerned.]

1 Ins. by S.O. 2615, dated 3rd October, 1987.

16(3) The Workmen's Compensation Occupational Diseases (Punjab) Rules, 1964